Against Authority Criminal Code, s. 59-61 Indictable

Sedition

Learn about sedition laws in Canada and the criminal offences related to it, as outlined in Part II of the Criminal Code on Offences Against Public Order.

Last reviewed: July 2026 Section: Criminal Code, s. 59-61 Classification: Indictable
Jump to section

Plain-Language Summary

Sedition: What It Means Under Canadian Law

Sedition means urging people to use force to change the government in Canada. It also covers writing or speaking in favour of this, without lawful authority. Good-faith criticism, or urging lawful change, is not sedition. The longest sentence is 14 years in prison. There is no minimum sentence.

Sedition is the use of speech or words to incite others to rebel against the government or governing authority. According to Section 59 of the Criminal CodeA federal act codifying most criminal offences in Canada, it is a crime to speak seditious words, publish a seditious libel, or be part of a seditious conspiracy. The Supreme Court of Canada has defined seditionConduct or speech encouraging resistance to government authority in a way covered by the Criminal Code. as any practice that is calculated to disturb the tranquillity of the state and lead ignorant persons to subvert the government and the laws of the empire. Seditious words, libel, and conspiracy are punishable by a maximum of 14 years in prison. However, peaceful and lawful protests against the government or its policies are not considered sedition.

 

What Is Sedition?

Sedition is commonly defined as words or speech that cause citizens to rebel against the government or governing authority. According to s.59 of the Criminal Code, it is a crime to speak seditious words, publish a seditious libel or being party to a seditious conspiracy.

What Are Seditious Words?

According to s.59 (1) of the Code, seditious words are those that "express a seditious intention." The Supreme Court of Canada has affirmed that anyone may "freely criticize the proceedings of courts of justice and of individual judges - in a free, and fair, and liberal spirit. But it must be without malignity, and not imputing corrupt or malicious motives." Section 60 of the Code reinforces this: no one is generally deemed to have a seditious intention merely because they intend, in good faith, to point out errors or defects in the administration of justice in Canada (s.60(b)(iii)). A person found guilty of speaking seditious words, publishing a seditious libel, or being party to a seditious conspiracy is liable on indictment to imprisonment for up to 14 years (s.61).

What Is a Seditious Libel?

Under s. 59(2) of the Code, a seditious libel is simply one "that expresses a seditious intention." The phrase "brings into hatred or contempt, or excites disaffection" against the government or the Crown comes from the older English common-law definition of seditious intention, language that Canadian courts have examined at length. The Supreme Court of Canada has held that the common-law formulation alone is not sufficient. A conviction for seditious libel generally requires proof that the accused intended to incite violence or resistance to, or defiance of, constituted authority, not merely to create disaffection or ill-will. Publishing critical statements about the government, without that intent to incite unlawful action, does not amount to seditious libel. Conviction on indictment under s. 61 can result in up to 14 years in prison; there is no summary convictionLess-serious criminal offences route for this offence.

What Is a Seditious Conspiracy?

Section 59(3) of the Code defines a seditious conspiracy as an agreement between two or more persons to carry out a seditious intention. Under s.59(4), a person is presumed to have a seditious intention when they teach, advocate, or publish writing that advocates the use of force (without legal authority) as a means of accomplishing a governmental change within Canada.

What Is ‘Seditious Intention’?

According to s.59 (4) of the Code, seditious intention can be generally defined as advocating any course of action with the intent of "accomplishing a governmental change within Canada" without the authority of law.

What the Crown Must Prove 

To win a conviction the Crown prosecutor must show that you used written words or speech to stir up opposition to the government or a governing body with the intent or overthrowing it. However, s.60 of the Code makes it clear that citizens are allowed to "point out errors or defects" in the government and its policies or in the administration of justice in Canada, as long as that is done peacefully and lawfully.

The Penalty for Sedition

Sedition is treated as an indictable offenceA more serious type of Canadian criminal offence. with a maximum punishment of 14 years in prison.

Exceptions — what is not sedition

Section 60 sets out express exceptions. Acting in good faith, a person may criticize government action, point out errors or defects in the Government of Canada, a provincial government, Parliament, a legislature, or the administration of justice, urge lawful change by lawful means, or point out matters that produce feelings of hostility between groups in order to have them removed. None of that, on its own, is sedition.

What the Crown Must Prove

To get a conviction, the Crown must prove every part of the offence beyond a reasonable doubt.

Section

1

Words, libel, or conspiracy expressing seditious intention

The Crown must prove the accused either spoke or published words expressing a seditious intention (s.59(1)), published a libel expressing a seditious intention (s.59(2)), or was party to an agreement between two or more persons to carry out a seditious intention (s.59(3)) - sedition can be committed by words, publication, or conspiracy.

2

Seditious intention

The Crown must prove the accused held (or the words/writing express) a seditious intention. Section 59(4) deems seditious intention to include teaching or advocating, or publishing or circulating any writing that advocates, the use of force - without lawful authority - as a means of accomplishing a governmental change within Canada.

3

Advocacy or use of force to bring about unlawful governmental change

Where the Crown relies on the s.59(4) presumption, it must show the accused's conduct advocated or used force, without the authority of law, specifically as a means of accomplishing a change in government (federal, provincial, or otherwise within Canada) - mere criticism of government is not enough on its own.

4

Conduct falls outside the good-faith statutory exception

The Crown must be able to show the conduct is not saved by section 60, which provides that no person is deemed to have a seditious intention by reason only of good-faith conduct: (a) showing the Crown has been misled or mistaken in its measures; (b) pointing out errors or defects in government, the constitution, legislation, or the administration of justice with a view to lawful reform; (c) procuring, by lawful means, the alteration of any matter of government; or (d) pointing out matters producing or tending to produce hostility between groups, with a view to their removal. This functions as a statutory exception/defence the accused can raise, and the Crown's case must survive it.

A proof rule (a presumption) is a rule about evidence. It does not mean the person is automatically guilty. It means the court may treat one fact as evidence of another fact unless there is evidence pointing the other way.

Possible Penalties

These are maximum sentences. Actual sentences depend on the facts, criminal history, and any mitigating or aggravating circumstances.

Speaking seditious words, publishing a seditious libel, or being a party to a seditious conspiracy — s. 61

Indictable
Maximum penalty
14 years
How it proceeds
Indictable only

No mandatory minimum applies.

What these words mean
Indictable
The more serious way to prosecute an offence. It can carry higher maximum penalties.
Summary conviction
The less serious, usually faster way to prosecute an offence, with lower maximum penalties.
Hybrid
An offence the Crown can prosecute either way — by indictment or by summary conviction.
Summary only
Summary-only offences are prosecuted by summary conviction. The Criminal Code sets the maximum penalty in the specific offence section.
Crown election
The Crown prosecutor’s choice of which way to proceed on a hybrid offence.

Possible Defences and Legal Issues

Sedition — ss.59–61

Section 60 creates a direct exception to the sedition offence. Even though section 59(4) sets out an evidentiary presumption of seditious intention in some situations, section 60 says that “no person shall be deemed to have a seditious intention by reason only that he intends, in good faith” to do one of a short list of things — including pointing out errors or defects in government, Parliament, a legislature, or “the administration of justice in Canada”, or procuring the lawful alteration of government matters by lawful means. If there is evidence capable of showing the person’s conduct falls within one of these good-faith purposes, the Crown must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that it does not. This exception is limited to the purposes the section lists and depends on the facts, including good faith and lawful means.

Common Legal Terms

Terms marked with a dotted underline in the article above are defined here and available in the full site glossary.

Indictable offence
Glossary entry →
A more serious type of Canadian criminal offence.
Summary offence
Glossary entry →
Less-serious criminal offences

Legal sources

The official statute section(s) this page is based on. Always confirm against the official source before relying on it.

  • Criminal Code s. 59 Seditious words, libel and conspiracy — definitions
    Source current to: 2026-05-26
    View official source ↗
  • Criminal Code s. 60 Exception — good-faith criticism and advocacy
    Source current to: 2026-05-26
    View official source ↗
  • Criminal Code s. 61 Punishment of seditious offences
    Source current to: 2026-05-26
    View official source ↗

Government References

Find a Criminal Defence Lawyer Near You

If you or someone you know is facing criminal charges, a criminal defence lawyer can review the situation and explain the options.

Search the Lawyer Directory

Criminal Code Help does not endorse or recommend specific lawyers.

Report an inaccuracy or concern about this page

Report an inaccuracy or concern about this page

Report: Sedition

Use this form to report a possible error, outdated information, unclear wording, broken link, or other concern about this page.

This form is for page concerns only. Do not send confidential case details or legal questions.

Fields marked with * are required.

What are you reporting?
Please include the sentence, section, or issue you are concerned about.
Optional. You may include a link to legislation, a court decision, or another reliable source.
Optional.
Optional. Include your email only if you are willing to be contacted about this report.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.