Theft
Theft means taking someone else's property, or treating it as your own, when you had no honest belief that you had a legal right to do that.
Jump to section
Plain-Language Summary
What theft is
Theft means taking someone else's property, or treating it as your own, when you had no honest belief that you had a legal right to do that. It still counts as theft even if you only meant to take the property for a while.
Two ideas in the law are worth knowing in plain terms:
- "Fraudulently" means the taking or use was dishonest — not accidental, and not based on an honest claim of right.
- "Colour of rightThe honest belief that an act is justifiable" means an honest belief that you actually had a legal right to the property. If you genuinely, even if mistakenly, believed the item was yours or that you were allowed to take it, that can be important to a theft charge.
What the prosecutor has to prove
"The Crown" is the prosecutor — the government lawyer who brings the charge. To convict you of theft, the prosecutor must prove, beyond a reasonable doubtThe high standard the Crown must meet to prove guilt., that:
- you took or used property that belonged to someone else;
- you did so dishonestly and without an honest belief you had a right to it; and
- you meant to steal it — for example, to keep it, to deprive the owner of it, or to deal with it so it could not be returned in the same condition.
The law also says theft can be complete as soon as you start to move the property with the intention of stealing it. You do not have to get away with it for it to count.
How theft is prosecuted
Canada deals with criminal charges in two main ways:
- Summary convictionLess-serious criminal offences — the process used for less serious cases, with lower maximum penalties.
- Indictable — the process used for more serious cases, with higher maximum penalties.
Most theft charges are hybrid, which means the prosecutor chooses which of those two ways to proceed, based on the case.
Possible penalties
Theft is split by the value of what was taken.
- Theft over $5,000, or theft of a will or similar document: if the prosecutor proceeds by indictment, the maximum is 10 years in prison. Lower maximums apply if the case proceeds by summary conviction.
- Theft of $5,000 or less: if the prosecutor proceeds by indictment, the maximum is 2 years in prison. Lower maximums apply if the case proceeds by summary conviction.
Related charges
Some theft-related charges are separate offences with their own rules and penalties. Examples may include theft by a person holding power of attorney, motor vehicle theft, credit-card offences, and robbery.
Those offences should be checked on their own pages.
What the Crown Must Prove
To get a conviction, the Crown must prove every part of the offence beyond a reasonable doubt.
Section 322
Property belonging to someone else
You took or used property that belonged to someone else.
Dishonesty, with no honest claim of right
You did so dishonestly and without an honest belief you had a right to it.
Intent to steal
You meant to steal it — for example, to keep it, to deprive the owner of it, or to deal with it so it could not be returned in the same condition.
A proof rule (a presumption) is a rule about evidence. It does not mean the person is automatically guilty. It means the court may treat one fact as evidence of another fact unless there is evidence pointing the other way.
Possible Penalties
These are maximum sentences. Actual sentences depend on the facts, criminal history, and any mitigating or aggravating circumstances.
Theft over $5,000, or of a will or similar document
HybridTheft of $5,000 or less
HybridTheft carries no mandatory minimum penalty.
What these words mean
- Indictable
- The more serious way to prosecute an offence. It can carry higher maximum penalties.
- Summary conviction
- The less serious, usually faster way to prosecute an offence, with lower maximum penalties.
- Hybrid
- An offence the Crown can prosecute either way — by indictment or by summary conviction.
- Summary only
- Summary-only offences are prosecuted by summary conviction. The Criminal Code sets the maximum penalty in the specific offence section.
- Crown election
- The Crown prosecutor’s choice of which way to proceed on a hybrid offence.
Possible Defences and Legal Issues
Theft — s.322
Section 322(1) says theft happens when a person "fraudulently and without colour of right takes" property, or converts it to their own use or the use of another person, with the intent to deprive the owner of it. Because "without colour of right" is part of the definition, if there is evidence capable of raising an honest claim of right, the Crown must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused acted without colour of right. Colour of right generally means an honest belief in a legal right to the property, or to deal with it as they did, even if that belief turns out to be mistaken. The word "fraudulently" is also part of the definition: the Crown must prove the taking or conversion was dishonest, not accidental, and not based on an honest claim of right.
What counts as an honest claim of right depends on the facts. Outside that, the Crown still has to prove the other parts of theft — for example, that the accused intended to deprive the owner of the property, temporarily or absolutely, or otherwise dealt with it as described in s.322(1). This is general legal information, not legal advice.
Common Legal Terms
Terms marked with a dotted underline in the article above are defined here and available in the full site glossary.
- Beyond a reasonable doubt Glossary entry →
- The high standard the Crown must meet to prove guilt.
- Colour of right Glossary entry →
- The honest belief that an act is justifiable
- Summary offence Glossary entry →
- Less-serious criminal offences
Legal sources
The official statute section(s) this page is based on. Always confirm against the official source before relying on it.
-
Criminal Code s. 322 Main offenceLast reviewed by CCH: 2026-06-19View official source ↗
-
Criminal Code s. 334 PenaltyLast reviewed by CCH: 2026-06-19View official source ↗
Government References
Find a Criminal Defence Lawyer Near You
If you or someone you know is facing criminal charges, a criminal defence lawyer can review the situation and explain the options.
Search the Lawyer DirectoryCriminal Code Help does not endorse or recommend specific lawyers.
Report an inaccuracy or concern about this page
Report an inaccuracy or concern about this page
Report: Theft
Use this form to report a possible error, outdated information, unclear wording, broken link, or other concern about this page.
General legal information only. Not legal advice. We do our best to keep this page accurate and up to date, but criminal law can change and every case depends on its facts. Check the review date and consult the Criminal Code or a criminal defence lawyer before relying on this information.
About this page
Criminal Code Help explains selected Criminal Code offences and related legal concepts in plain language. The goal is to help readers understand the general meaning of the law without having to read the full statutory text.
This page is a simplified summary. It does not include every exception, definition, court interpretation, evidentiary issue, Charter issue, sentencing factor, or procedural rule that may apply in a real case.
Legal information, not legal advice
This page is general legal information only. It is not legal advice and should not be relied on as advice about any specific charge, investigation, court file, or personal situation.
Possible defences and legal issues depend on the facts, the evidence, the exact charge, current Canadian law, and the province or territory where the case is being handled. If you are facing a criminal charge or researching a real legal problem, speak with a criminal defence lawyer in your province or territory.