Property Offences Criminal Code, s. 322, 334 Hybrid

Theft

Theft means taking someone else's property, or treating it as your own, when you had no honest belief that you had a legal right to do that.

Last reviewed: June 2026 Section: Criminal Code, s. 322, 334 Classification: Hybrid
Jump to section

Plain-Language Summary

Theft: The Law and the Penalties

Theft means taking someone else's property, or treating it as your own, without an honest belief you had the right to do so. The Crown must show you intended to deprive the owner of the property. Theft over $5,000 can carry up to 10 years in prison. Theft of $5,000 or less can carry up to 2 years.

What theft is

Theft means taking someone else's property, or treating it as your own, when you had no honest belief that you had a legal right to do that. It still counts as theft even if you only meant to take the property for a while.

Two ideas in the law are worth knowing in plain terms:

  • "Fraudulently" means the taking or use was dishonest — not accidental, and not based on an honest claim of right.
  • "Colour of rightThe honest belief that an act is justifiable" means an honest belief that you actually had a legal right to the property. If you genuinely, even if mistakenly, believed the item was yours or that you were allowed to take it, that can be important to a theft charge.
Legal source: Criminal Code section 322.

What the prosecutor has to prove

"The Crown" is the prosecutor — the government lawyer who brings the charge. To convict you of theft, the prosecutor must prove, beyond a reasonable doubtThe high standard the Crown must meet to prove guilt., that:

  1. you took or used property that belonged to someone else;
  2. you did so dishonestly and without an honest belief you had a right to it; and
  3. you meant to steal it — for example, to keep it, to deprive the owner of it, or to deal with it so it could not be returned in the same condition.

The law also says theft can be complete as soon as you start to move the property with the intention of stealing it. You do not have to get away with it for it to count.

Legal source: Criminal Code section 322(1) and section 322(2).

How theft is prosecuted

Canada deals with criminal charges in two main ways:

  • Summary convictionLess-serious criminal offences — the process used for less serious cases, with lower maximum penalties.
  • Indictable — the process used for more serious cases, with higher maximum penalties.

Most theft charges are hybrid, which means the prosecutor chooses which of those two ways to proceed, based on the case.

Possible penalties

Theft is split by the value of what was taken.

  • Theft over $5,000, or theft of a will or similar document: if the prosecutor proceeds by indictment, the maximum is 10 years in prison. Lower maximums apply if the case proceeds by summary conviction.
  • Theft of $5,000 or less: if the prosecutor proceeds by indictment, the maximum is 2 years in prison. Lower maximums apply if the case proceeds by summary conviction.
Legal source: Criminal Code section 334. Theft itself carries no mandatory minimum penalty.

Related charges

Some theft-related charges are separate offences with their own rules and penalties. Examples may include theft by a person holding power of attorney, motor vehicle theft, credit-card offences, and robbery.

Those offences should be checked on their own pages.

What the Crown Must Prove

To get a conviction, the Crown must prove every part of the offence beyond a reasonable doubt.

Section 322

1

Property belonging to someone else

You took or used property that belonged to someone else.

2

Dishonesty, with no honest claim of right

You did so dishonestly and without an honest belief you had a right to it.

3

Intent to steal

You meant to steal it — for example, to keep it, to deprive the owner of it, or to deal with it so it could not be returned in the same condition.

A proof rule (a presumption) is a rule about evidence. It does not mean the person is automatically guilty. It means the court may treat one fact as evidence of another fact unless there is evidence pointing the other way.

Possible Penalties

These are maximum sentences. Actual sentences depend on the facts, criminal history, and any mitigating or aggravating circumstances.

Theft over $5,000, or of a will or similar document

Hybrid
Maximum (by indictment)
10 years
How it proceeds
Crown may proceed by indictment or summary conviction; lower maximums apply on summary conviction

Theft of $5,000 or less

Hybrid
Maximum (by indictment)
2 years
How it proceeds
Crown may proceed by indictment or summary conviction; lower maximums apply on summary conviction

Theft carries no mandatory minimum penalty.

What these words mean
Indictable
The more serious way to prosecute an offence. It can carry higher maximum penalties.
Summary conviction
The less serious, usually faster way to prosecute an offence, with lower maximum penalties.
Hybrid
An offence the Crown can prosecute either way — by indictment or by summary conviction.
Summary only
Summary-only offences are prosecuted by summary conviction. The Criminal Code sets the maximum penalty in the specific offence section.
Crown election
The Crown prosecutor’s choice of which way to proceed on a hybrid offence.

Possible Defences and Legal Issues

Theft — s.322

Section 322(1) says theft happens when a person "fraudulently and without colour of right takes" property, or converts it to their own use or the use of another person, with the intent to deprive the owner of it. Because "without colour of right" is part of the definition, if there is evidence capable of raising an honest claim of right, the Crown must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused acted without colour of right. Colour of right generally means an honest belief in a legal right to the property, or to deal with it as they did, even if that belief turns out to be mistaken. The word "fraudulently" is also part of the definition: the Crown must prove the taking or conversion was dishonest, not accidental, and not based on an honest claim of right.

What counts as an honest claim of right depends on the facts. Outside that, the Crown still has to prove the other parts of theft — for example, that the accused intended to deprive the owner of the property, temporarily or absolutely, or otherwise dealt with it as described in s.322(1). This is general legal information, not legal advice.

Common Legal Terms

Terms marked with a dotted underline in the article above are defined here and available in the full site glossary.

Beyond a reasonable doubt
Glossary entry →
The high standard the Crown must meet to prove guilt.
Colour of right
Glossary entry →
The honest belief that an act is justifiable
Summary offence
Glossary entry →
Less-serious criminal offences

Legal sources

The official statute section(s) this page is based on. Always confirm against the official source before relying on it.

Government References

Find a Criminal Defence Lawyer Near You

If you or someone you know is facing criminal charges, a criminal defence lawyer can review the situation and explain the options.

Search the Lawyer Directory

Criminal Code Help does not endorse or recommend specific lawyers.

Report an inaccuracy or concern about this page

Report an inaccuracy or concern about this page

Report: Theft

Use this form to report a possible error, outdated information, unclear wording, broken link, or other concern about this page.

This form is for page concerns only. Do not send confidential case details or legal questions.

Fields marked with * are required.

What are you reporting?
Please include the sentence, section, or issue you are concerned about.
Optional. You may include a link to legislation, a court decision, or another reliable source.
Optional.
Optional. Include your email only if you are willing to be contacted about this report.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.