Property Offences Criminal Code, s. 356 Hybrid

Mail Theft

Mail theft is common in Canada around the holiday season when people send gifts or money. Mail fraud can land you in jail for up to 10 years.

Last reviewed: July 2026 Section: Criminal Code, s. 356 Classification: Hybrid
Jump to section

Plain-Language Summary

Mail Theft: What the Charge Means

Mail theft covers stealing mail or Canada Post keys, making, possessing, or using copied keys to steal mail, possessing items known to be linked to mail theft, or fraudulently redirecting mail. It is a hybrid offence. The maximum is 10 years by indictment. Summary cases can carry up to 2 years less a day, a $5,000 fine, or both.

Mail Theft: Although it may seem to be an insignificant crime to some, mail fraud can land you in jail for up to 10 years. Police report that stolen mail can be used in identity theftObtaining someone's identity information to commit a crime scams. As well, credit cards can be stolen and cheques can be taken and altered before being cashed. Every year, mail theftUnlawfully taking someone's mail rings are responsible for breaking into Canada Post mailboxes. Mail and packages are also taken from residential mailboxes. Under s.356 of the Criminal CodeA federal act codifying most criminal offences in Canada anyone who steals anything sent by post faces conviction. 

What is Mail Theft?

Mail theft is a common occurrence, especially around the traditional Christmas holiday season when more people send gifts or money through Canada Post. Community mailboxes, Canada Post receptacles and house and apartment mail boxes are commonly targeted by thieves. Thieves are generally looking for cash, credit cards, bank cards or cheques. They can also use personal information contained in bills to create fake identities. 

The offence is covered by Part IX of Offences Against Rights of Property. Under s.356 (1) of the Criminal Code you will face charges if you steal anything sent by post, either after it is deposited at a post office and before it is delivered, or after it is delivered but before it is in the possessionHaving knowledge and control of something — not only physically holding it, but also an item kept somewhere else that you know about and control. of the person it was intended for.

If you steal a Canada Post bag, sack or other container used to convey mail you can also be charged, even if it didn't contain mail. The offence goes beyond the actual theft of mail. You could also face trial if you make, possess or use a copy of a key to unlock a receptacle or device used for mail. It is also a crime to fraudulently redirect or have a hand in redirecting anything sent by post.

What is Needed to Convict

To win a conviction for mail theft or the related offences, the Crown prosecutorA lawyer who conducts a criminal prosecution on behalf of the public. must prove beyond a reasonable doubtThe standard that must be exceeded to find someone guilty you were in possession of mail or keys used to access Canada Post receptacles. Many homes and buildings now have security cameras intended to prevent the theft of parcels, and surveillance footage may be available to be used as evidence.

Identity could be an issue. Your defence lawyer may be to establish that you are not the person on the surveillance footage. You may also be able to argue that police have exceeded their powers and violated your rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. You have the right to be free from unreasonable police searches. You have the right to know when you are being arrested. You have the right to a lawyer. These are rights that can impact your case.

Treated as a Summary or Indictable Offence

Mail theft is treated as a hybrid offenceAn offence the Crown can proceed with summarily or by indictment.. How the Crown decides to proceed will depend on the seriousness of the offence, the number of victims and if you have a criminal record. A Summary offenceLess-serious criminal offences is for less serious crimes such as thefts under $5,000, while an indictable offenceA more serious type of Canadian criminal offence. include murder, sexual assault and aggravated assault and carry much harsher penalties upon conviction.

Penalties for Mail Theft

There are no mandatory minimums for committing mail theft. If the Crown elects to proceed by indictment, you could face a maximum prison term of 10 years. You will also have a criminal record.

What Mail Theft Covers

Mail theft under s. 356 is broader than simply taking mail from a mailbox. It can include stealing things in the postal stream, stealing mail bags or Canada Post keys, copying or using mail-access keys for that purpose, possessing things connected to mail theft, or fraudulently redirecting mail.

Possible Penalties

These are maximum sentences. Actual sentences depend on the facts, criminal history, and any mitigating or aggravating circumstances.

Theft from mail — s. 356(1)(a)

Hybrid
Maximum penalty (by indictment)
10 years
How it proceeds
Crown may proceed by indictment or summary conviction

Covers stealing anything sent by post while in the postal stream, a mail bag or container, or a Canada Post key. No section-specific summary maximum is stated; the general s. 787 default applies — a fine of up to $5,000 and/or imprisonment of up to two years less a day.

Possession of anything obtained by mail theft — s. 356(1)(b)

Hybrid
Maximum penalty (by indictment)
10 years
How it proceeds
Crown may proceed by indictment or summary conviction

Knowingly possessing anything obtained by or used in an offence under s. 356(1)(a) or the key-copying limb (s. 356(1)(a.1)). The same penalty provision (s. 356(3)) covers the whole offence — these rows show the same maximum against two common fact patterns.

What these words mean
Indictable
The more serious way to prosecute an offence. It can carry higher maximum penalties.
Summary conviction
The less serious, usually faster way to prosecute an offence, with lower maximum penalties.
Hybrid
An offence the Crown can prosecute either way — by indictment or by summary conviction.
Summary only
Summary-only offences are prosecuted by summary conviction. The Criminal Code sets the maximum penalty in the specific offence section.
Crown election
The Crown prosecutor’s choice of which way to proceed on a hybrid offence.

Possible Defences and Legal Issues

This page covers more than one section. Possible defences and legal issues are set out by section below.

Mail Theft — s.356

Section 356 does not list a special defence in the Criminal Code. The Crown still has to prove the parts of the offence charged. Depending on the branch of the charge, this may mean proving that the accused stole something sent by post, stole a mail bag, sack, or other mail container, made, possessed, or used a copy of a key meant for a Canada Post receptacle or device, possessed something connected to one of those acts knowing it had been used for that purpose, or fraudulently redirected something sent by post.

Possible issues may still depend on the facts, the evidence, and whether the Crown can prove each part of the offence. This is general legal information, not legal advice.

Mail Theft — the “steals” branch, s. 356(1)(a) and s. 322

Paragraph 356(1)(a) applies where a person “steals” mail-related items. Theft is defined in section 322, which uses the words “fraudulently and without colour of right”. Because “without colour of right” is part of the theft definition, if there is evidence capable of raising an honest claim of right, the Crown must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the taking was fraudulent and without colour of right.

This applies to the stealing branch only. The other branches of section 356 — such as possession of stolen mail or fraudulently redirecting mail — have their own elements, and this issue does not automatically apply to them. This is general legal information, not legal advice.

Common Legal Terms

Terms marked with a dotted underline in the article above are defined here and available in the full site glossary.

Crown prosecutor
Glossary entry →

A Crown prosecutor is a lawyer who conducts a criminal prosecution on behalf of the public. The Crown’s role is to present the case fairly, exercise independent judgment, and act in the public interest. The Crown’s role is not simply to obtain a conviction.

Hybrid offence
Glossary entry →

A hybrid offence is an offence where the Crown can choose whether to proceed by summary conviction or by indictment. The choice can affect the procedure, possible penalties, and sometimes the court where the case is heard.

Indictable offence
Glossary entry →

An indictable offence is generally a more serious type of Canadian criminal offence. Some indictable matters have higher maximum penalties and may involve different court procedures, including election about the mode of trial in some cases.

Possession
Glossary entry →

In criminal law, possession means having knowledge and control of something. It does not only mean physically holding an item — it can include an item kept somewhere else, or in someone else's keeping for your use or benefit, that you know about and have control over.

Reasonable doubt
Glossary entry →

The Supreme Court of Canada has said that reasonable doubt “falls much closer to absolute certainty than to proof on a balance of probabilities” and “that something less than absolute certainty is required, and that something more than probable guilt is required."

Summary offence
Glossary entry →

Summary offences are less-serious criminal offences such as disturbing the peace or unlawful assembly

Legal sources

The official statute section(s) this page is based on. Always confirm against the official source before relying on it.

Find a Criminal Defence Lawyer Near You

If you or someone you know is facing criminal charges, a criminal defence lawyer can review the situation and explain the options.

Search the Lawyer Directory

Criminal Code Help does not endorse or recommend specific lawyers.

Report an inaccuracy or concern about this page

Report an inaccuracy or concern about this page

Report: Mail Theft

Use this form to report a possible error, outdated information, unclear wording, broken link, or other concern about this page.

This form is for page concerns only. Do not send confidential case details or legal questions.

Fields marked with * are required.

What are you reporting?
Please include the sentence, section, or issue you are concerned about.
Optional. You may include a link to legislation, a court decision, or another reliable source.
Optional.
Optional. Include your email only if you are willing to be contacted about this report.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.