Property Offences Criminal Code, s. 348, 349

Break and Enter

Break and Enter crimes are one of Canada's most commonly committed property offences. It is also one of the serious crimes in the Criminal Code.

Last reviewed: June 2026 Section: Criminal Code, s. 348, 349 Procedure: Procedure depends on the section and facts
Jump to section

Plain-Language Summary

Break and Enter: The Law in Plain Language

Break and enter means going into a place you're not allowed to be — like a home or business — to commit a crime inside. You can be charged even if nothing was stolen. Breaking into a home carries the heaviest penalties.

Break and Enter with Intent: Breaking into a home or business to steal property is one of the most commonly committed property offences in the country. It is also one of the serious crimes in the Criminal CodeA federal act codifying most criminal offences in Canada. It doesn't matter if you walked through an unlocked door or that did not actually take anything, the offenceA criminal activity of break and enter with intent as outlined in s.348 (1) of the Code is an indictable offence. If you are caught breaking into a property such as a business, you could face up to 10 years in custody. If you enter a home without reason with intent to commit an indictable offence, the consequences are much worse and you could be imprisoned for life.

Break and Enter

Break and enter is defined as entering a residence, business or other property without permission to commit a crime. A forced entry is not required. Even if you enter the building through an open window or an unlocked door, if you did not have permission to be there you could face charges even if no theft, injury to occupants or property damage occurs.

Research shows residential break-ins occur every 90 seconds in Canada, and the majority happen during daylight hours. It is a common crime that has been increasing in frequency over the years, especially during the pandemic.

According to the Criminal Code you can be found guilty of the offence of breaking and entering with intent if you:

  • break and enter a place with intent to commit an indictable offenceA more serious type of Canadian criminal offence.;
  • break and enter a place and commit an indictable offence; or
  • break out of a place after committing an indictable offence;

The property can be a dwelling-house; a building or structure or any part thereof; a railway vehicle, a vessel, an aircraft or a trailer; or a pen or an enclosure in which fur-bearing animals are kept in captivity for breeding or commercial purposes.

Although there is no specific charge of home invasion in the Code, the court treats those who enter a home and cause bodily harm to the occupants harshly. Even if the residents are unharmed, breaking into a home while there is someone there is seen as an aggravating factor upon sentencing.

How the Charge May Proceed

How a break-and-enter charge proceeds depends on where it happened and which section the Crown relies on.

  • Break and enter of a dwelling-house (s. 348): this is treated as an indictable offence, and the maximum is imprisonment for life.
  • Break and enter of a place other than a dwelling-house (s. 348): the Crown can proceed by indictment, with a maximum of 10 years, or by summary convictionLess-serious criminal offences.
  • Being unlawfully in a dwelling-house (s. 349): the Crown can proceed by indictment, with a maximum of 10 years, or by summary conviction.

What the Crown Must Prove

To get a conviction, the Crown must prove every part of the offence beyond a reasonable doubt.

Break and enter (s. 348) — main offence

1

Identity

The Crown must prove the accused is the person who committed the offence.

2

A break and enter, or a breaking out

That the accused broke and entered a place, or broke out of it. Under the Criminal Code, 'breaking' includes opening any door or window — even if it is unlocked — as well as breaking through a wall or other part of a structure.

3

The place

That the location is a "place" as the Criminal Code defines it: a dwelling-house; a building or structure (or part of one); a railway vehicle, vessel, aircraft or trailer; or a pen or enclosure for fur-bearing animals kept for breeding or commercial purposes.

4

Intent to commit an indictable offence, or committing one inside

That the accused intended to commit an indictable offence inside, or actually committed one after entering.

5

Whether it was a dwelling-house

Whether the place was a dwelling-house, because that affects how serious the penalty can be.

Proof rule

Evidence of breaking and entering (s. 348(2))

Under s. 348(2), evidence of breaking and entering can be treated as evidence of intent to commit an indictable offence, unless there is evidence to the contrary.

Being unlawfully in a dwelling-house (s. 349) — related offence

1

Identity

The Crown must prove the accused is the person involved.

2

Entering or being in a dwelling-house

That the accused entered or was inside a dwelling-house.

3

Without lawful excuse

That the accused was there without a lawful excuse. Section 349 uses these exact words, so whether there was a lawful reason to be there can be in issue.

4

Intent to commit an indictable offence inside

That the accused intended to commit an indictable offence inside the dwelling-house.

Proof rule

Evidence of being there without lawful excuse (s. 349(2))

Under s. 349(2), evidence that the person was in the dwelling-house without lawful excuse can be treated as evidence of intent to commit an indictable offence, unless there is evidence to the contrary.

A proof rule (a presumption) is a rule about evidence. It does not mean the person is automatically guilty. It means the court may treat one fact as evidence of another fact unless there is evidence pointing the other way.

Possible Penalties

These are maximum sentences. Actual sentences depend on the facts, criminal history, and any mitigating or aggravating circumstances.

Dwelling-house — s. 348

Indictable
Maximum penalty
Life imprisonment
How it proceeds
Indictable only

Other place — s. 348

Hybrid
Maximum penalty (by indictment)
10 years
How it proceeds
Crown may proceed by indictment or summary conviction

Unlawfully in a dwelling-house — s. 349

Hybrid
Maximum penalty (by indictment)
10 years
How it proceeds
Crown may proceed by indictment or summary conviction

Related offence — shown for completeness.

What these words mean
Indictable
The more serious way to prosecute an offence. It can carry higher maximum penalties.
Summary conviction
The less serious, usually faster way to prosecute an offence, with lower maximum penalties.
Hybrid
An offence the Crown can prosecute either way — by indictment or by summary conviction.
Summary only
Summary-only offences are prosecuted by summary conviction. The Criminal Code sets the maximum penalty in the specific offence section.
Crown election
The Crown prosecutor’s choice of which way to proceed on a hybrid offence.

Sentencing Factors

Things a court may treat as making the offence more serious when it decides a sentence. These are not separate offences.

Home invasion — sentencing factor s. 348.1

Where a break and enter relates to a dwelling-house, Criminal Code s. 348.1 may require the sentencing court to treat the offence as more serious if the home was occupied, the person knew or was reckless about whether it was occupied, and violence or threats of violence were used.

Aggravating circumstance — home invasion
348.1 If a person is convicted of an offence under section 98 or 98.1, subsection 279(2) or section 343, 346 or 348 in relation to a dwelling-house, the court imposing the sentence on the person shall consider as an aggravating circumstance the fact that the dwelling-house was occupied at the time of the commission of the offence and that the person, in committing the offence,
(a) knew that or was reckless as to whether the dwelling-house was occupied; and
(b) used violence or threats of violence to a person or property.
View official source ↗

Possible Defences and Legal Issues

This page covers more than one section. Possible defences and legal issues are set out by section below.

Break and enter — s. 348

Section 348 does not list a specific defence in the offence itself. The Crown still has to prove the charge. Depending on the facts, the issues may include who was involved, whether there was a break and enter or breaking out, whether the place fits the Criminal Code definition, and whether the person intended to commit an indictable offence.

Other issues may still depend on the facts, the evidence, and whether the Crown can prove the parts of the offence. Ordinary criminal-law defences may still apply depending on the exact charge and the facts. This is general legal information, not legal advice.

Being unlawfully in a dwelling-house — s. 349

Section 349 uses the words "without lawful excuse." In plain language, this means the court may have to consider whether the person had a lawful reason for being in the dwelling-house. This may involve questions about permission, legal authority, the type of building, and intent.

Common Legal Terms

Terms marked with a dotted underline in the article above are defined here and available in the full site glossary.

Beyond a reasonable doubt
Glossary entry →
The high standard the Crown must meet to prove guilt.
Crown prosecutor
Glossary entry →
A lawyer who conducts a criminal prosecution on behalf of the public.
Indictable offence
Glossary entry →
A more serious type of Canadian criminal offence.
Summary offence
Glossary entry →
Less-serious criminal offences

Legal sources

The official statute section(s) this page is based on. Always confirm against the official source before relying on it.

Government References

Find a Criminal Defence Lawyer Near You

If you or someone you know is facing criminal charges, a criminal defence lawyer can review the situation and explain the options.

Search the Lawyer Directory

Criminal Code Help does not endorse or recommend specific lawyers.

Report an inaccuracy or concern about this page

Report an inaccuracy or concern about this page

Report: Break and Enter

Use this form to report a possible error, outdated information, unclear wording, broken link, or other concern about this page.

This form is for page concerns only. Do not send confidential case details or legal questions.

Fields marked with * are required.

What are you reporting?
Please include the sentence, section, or issue you are concerned about.
Optional. You may include a link to legislation, a court decision, or another reliable source.
Optional.
Optional. Include your email only if you are willing to be contacted about this report.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.