Sexual Offences Criminal Code, s. 163, 169 Hybrid

Obscenity

The definition has changed over time, but the courts have ruled that obscenity violates accepted community standards and serves no artistic purpose.

Last reviewed: July 2026 Section: Criminal Code, s. 163, 169 Classification: Hybrid
Jump to section

Plain-Language Summary

Obscenity: What Counts as the Offence

Obscenity means making, distributing, selling, or possessing material the law calls obscene — where sex is the main focus, taken too far. For some charges, the Crown must prove you knew what it was. The longest sentence is 2 years. A lesser charge can bring up to 2 years less a day, a fine up to $5,000, or both.

Obscenity in Canada, defined under s.163 of the Criminal CodeA federal act codifying most criminal offences in Canada, involves creating, distributing, or possessing obscene materialShowing an undue exploitation of sex like photos, videos, or audio recordings. This includes anything that unreasonably exploits sex, crime, horror, cruelty, and violence. The Supreme Court's R. v. Butler case established two tests for obscenityMaterial that the law treats as obscene because of undue exploitation of sex, violence, or related themes.: community standards and artistic merit. Even though Canadians have the right to free expression, the government can set limits if justified. Conviction requires proof beyond a reasonable doubtThe high standard the Crown must meet to prove guilt., and obscenity is a hybrid offenceA criminal activity, meaning it can be prosecuted as an indictable offence or by summary conviction, depending on factors like the incident's seriousness and the defendant's past criminal record. The maximum penalty, if indicted, is two years less a day in jail.

What is Obscenity in Canada?

Section 163 of the Criminal Code makes it an offence to print, publish or distribute obscene written matter, such as photos, video or audio recordings. It is also a crime to have these items in your possessionHaving knowledge and control of something — not only physically holding it, but also an item kept somewhere else that you know about and control., or to publicly exhibit "a disgusting object or an indecent show." This section of the Code makes it clear that any "undue exploitation of sex, crime, horror, cruelty and violence," shall be deemed to be obscene.

Under Canadian law, for material to qualify as "obscene," the exploitation of sex must not only be a dominant characteristic, but must also be "undue." To judge what is undue, the court recommended two tests: community standards and artistic merit. The first looks at whether the material would be offensive to average citizen and the second is whether the portrayal of sex is essential for an artistic or similar purpose.

The Supreme Court further divided obscenity into three categories:

  1. Explicit sex with violence would almost always constitute obscenity.
  2. Explicit sex without violence but subjects people to degrading or dehumanizing treatment could be obscene if it exceeds the community tolerance.
  3. The community generally tolerates explicit sex without violence that is neither degrading nor dehumanizing and would not qualify as obscene.

Keep in mind that while freedom of expression is a fundamental right given to Canadians under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Charter also allows the government to pass laws that limit free expression so long as the limits are reasonable and can be "justified in a free and democratic society."

What is Needed to Convict

Under s. 163(4), whether the material served the public good is a legal question decided by the judge. Whether the acts went further than needed to serve that public good is a factual question for the judge or jury deciding the case.

Treated as a Hybrid Offence

Obscenity is a hybrid offenceAn offence the Crown can proceed with summarily or by indictment., meaning the Crown can prosecute the charge as an indictable offenceA more serious type of Canadian criminal offence. or by summary convictionLess-serious criminal offences. Being found guilty of an indictable offence carries more severe penalties than a summary conviction. The Crown will consider such factors as the seriousness of the incident and your prior criminal record when deciding how to proceed.

Penalties for Obscenity

If the charge is treated as an indictable offence the maximum punishment is 2 years in jail, with lesser penalty given if the Crown prosecutes it as a summary conviction.

Obscenity and the Criminal Code

Obscenity is charged under s. 163 of the Criminal Code, under the offence heading 'corrupting morals.' The penalty is set separately by s. 169.

Possible Penalties

These are maximum sentences. Actual sentences depend on the facts, criminal history, and any mitigating or aggravating circumstances.

Making, printing, publishing, distributing, circulating, or possessing obscene material for those purposes — s. 163(1)

Hybrid
Maximum penalty (by indictment)
2 years
How it proceeds
Crown may proceed by indictment or summary conviction

Punishment is set by s. 169. No section-specific summary maximum is stated; the general s. 787 default applies — a fine of up to $5,000 and/or imprisonment of up to two years less a day. No mandatory minimum.

Knowingly selling obscene material, exposing it to public view, possessing it for that purpose, or publicly exhibiting a disgusting object or indecent show — s. 163(2)

Hybrid
Maximum penalty (by indictment)
2 years
How it proceeds
Crown may proceed by indictment or summary conviction

Punishment is set by s. 169. No section-specific summary maximum is stated; the general s. 787 default applies — a fine of up to $5,000 and/or imprisonment of up to two years less a day. No mandatory minimum.

What these words mean
Indictable
The more serious way to prosecute an offence. It can carry higher maximum penalties.
Summary conviction
The less serious, usually faster way to prosecute an offence, with lower maximum penalties.
Hybrid
An offence the Crown can prosecute either way — by indictment or by summary conviction.
Summary only
Summary-only offences are prosecuted by summary conviction. The Criminal Code sets the maximum penalty in the specific offence section.
Crown election
The Crown prosecutor’s choice of which way to proceed on a hybrid offence.

Possible Defences and Legal Issues

Obscenity — s.163

Section 163 has a public-good defence. No person can be convicted under this section "if the public good was served by the acts that are alleged to constitute the offence and if the acts alleged did not extend beyond what served the public good". Whether an act served the public good is a question of law for the judge; whether the acts went beyond that is a question of fact.

For the selling, exposing-to-view, or public-exhibition offence in s.163(2), the offence itself only applies "without lawful justification or excuse". If there is evidence capable of raising a lawful justification or excuse, the Crown must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the act was done without lawful justification or excuse. What counts as a lawful justification or excuse depends on the facts and the law.

Common Legal Terms

Terms marked with a dotted underline in the article above are defined here and available in the full site glossary.

Hybrid offence
Glossary entry →
An offence the Crown can proceed with summarily or by indictment.
Indictable offence
Glossary entry →
A more serious type of Canadian criminal offence.
Possession
Glossary entry →
Having knowledge and control of something — not only physically holding it, but also an item kept somewhere else that you know about and control.
Summary offence
Glossary entry →
Less-serious criminal offences

Legal sources

The official statute section(s) this page is based on. Always confirm against the official source before relying on it.

Government References

Find a Criminal Defence Lawyer Near You

If you or someone you know is facing criminal charges, a criminal defence lawyer can review the situation and explain the options.

Search the Lawyer Directory

Criminal Code Help does not endorse or recommend specific lawyers.

Report an inaccuracy or concern about this page

Report an inaccuracy or concern about this page

Report: Obscenity

Use this form to report a possible error, outdated information, unclear wording, broken link, or other concern about this page.

This form is for page concerns only. Do not send confidential case details or legal questions.

Fields marked with * are required.

What are you reporting?
Please include the sentence, section, or issue you are concerned about.
Optional. You may include a link to legislation, a court decision, or another reliable source.
Optional.
Optional. Include your email only if you are willing to be contacted about this report.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.