Fraudulent Transactions Criminal Code, s. 380, 362, 366-368

Mortgage Fraud

You can be charged with mortgage fraud in Canada if you deliberately misrepresent information to obtain mortgage financing.

Last reviewed: July 2026 Section: Criminal Code, s. 380, 362, 366-368 Procedure: Procedure depends on the section and facts
Jump to section

Plain-Language Summary

Mortgage Fraud: The Law, Charges and Penalties

Mortgage fraud means using deceit, falsehood, or other dishonest means to defraud someone, knowing your conduct was dishonest. The Crown does not need to prove an actual loss — putting someone's finances at real risk is enough. Fraud over $5,000 can carry up to 14 years. Fraud of $5,000 or less carries up to 2 years.

Mortgage Fraud: Section 385 of the Criminal CodeA federal act codifying most criminal offences in Canada states you can be charged with mortgage fraudProviding false information on a mortgage application if you deliberately misrepresent information to obtain mortgage financing that would not have been granted if the truth had been known. There are many other charges that are related to this crime, with maximum two-year sentences given for most, though five-year prison terms are possible for fraudulently registering a title. Finding inconsistencies in the Crown's financial evidence is one common defence for those charged.

What is Mortgage Fraud?

Section 385 of the Criminal Code makes it an offence to induce a purchaser, mortgagee or creditor to accept a mortgage while concealing any encumbranceA burden or impediment on the title. Importantly, no prosecution under s.385 can begin without the Attorney General's consentVoluntary agreement to engage in an sexual act. Mortgage fraud more broadly occurs when anyone — including a mortgage broker, real estate agent or lawyer — misrepresents information to obtain a mortgage that would not otherwise have been approved.

Types of Mortgage-Related Fraud

Fraudulent Concealment of Title Documents

Section 385 of the Code makes it illegal for a vendor, mortgagor, or their representative to conceal from a buyer or lender any settlement, deed, will, or other instrument or act material to the title, or any encumbrance on the title, with intent to defraud. Falsifying the chain of title (the "pedigree" of ownership) is also covered. Note that proceedings under this section require the consent of the Attorney General.

Fraudulent Registration of Title

Section 386 of the Code makes it illegal for anyone acting as a principal, agent, or mandatary in a property registration proceeding to knowingly and with intent to deceive make a material false statement or representation, or to suppress or conceal from a registrar or judge any material document, fact, or information.

Fraudulent Sale of Real Property

Section 387 of the Code makes it illegal to knowingly sell real property while aware of a prior unregistered sale, or of an existing unregistered grant, mortgage, lien, hypothec, or encumbrance affecting that property.

Misleading Receipt

Section 388 of the Code makes it illegal to knowingly, and with intent to mislead, injure, or defraud someone, issue a written receipt or acknowledgment for property before that property has actually been delivered or received. It is also illegal to knowingly accept, transmit, or use such a premature receipt. The identity of the intended victim need not be known to the person issuing the receipt.

Fraudulent Disposal of Goods on Which Money Advanced

Section 389 of the Code targets a vendor or consignor who ships goods to a warehouse, factor, agent, or carrier where the person receiving the goods (the consignee) has advanced money or given valuable security against those goods. It is an offence for the vendor to then dispose of the goods in a way that is inconsistent with any agreement made with the consignee, with intent to deceive, defraud, or injure the consignee. It is also an offence to knowingly assist someone to do this. A defence exists if the vendor pays or tenders the full amount advanced by the consignee before making the inconsistent disposition.

Fraudulent Receipts Under Bank Act

Section 390 of the Code makes it illegal to knowingly make a false statement in any receipt, certificate, or acknowledgment that may be used for a purpose mentioned in the Bank Act. It is also illegal to knowingly alienate or part with property after giving another person such a receipt, certificate, or acknowledgment for it, without the consent in writing of the holder or without producing and delivering the original document.

Disposal of Property to Defraud Creditors

Section 392 of the Code makes it illegal to dispose of your own property with intent to defraud your creditors. This includes making gifts, conveyances, assignments, sales, transfers, or deliveries of property, or removing, concealing, or otherwise disposing of it. Receiving property from someone who has disposed of it in this way, intending that it be used to defraud their creditors, is also an offence.

False Pretence or False Statement

Section 362 of the Code makes it illegal to obtain property, money, or credit by a false pretence or by fraud. One example relevant to mortgage fraud is making a false written statement about your financial means with intent that it be relied upon to secure a loan or credit advance. Where the value involved exceeds $5,000, or where credit is obtained by false pretence or fraud, the offence on indictment carries a maximum of 10 years imprisonment. On summary convictionUsed for lesser offences the default maximum is a $5,000 fine and/or two years less a day imprisonment.

Forgery

Section 366 of the Code makes it illegal to make a false document while knowing it is false and intending that it be used as genuine to the prejudice of another person. In the context of mortgage fraud, forging title documents, mortgage applications, identification, or appraisals can engage this provision. The punishment provision is in section 367, which provides for a maximum of 10 years imprisonment on indictment.

Use, Trafficking or Possession of a Forged Document

Section 368 of the Code makes it illegal to use or deal with a forged document as if it were genuine, to cause someone else to use it as genuine, to transfer or sell a forged document knowing that an offence will result, or to possess a forged document with intent to use it fraudulently. The maximum penalty on indictment is 10 years imprisonment. This provision often accompanies forgery charges in mortgage fraud cases where fabricated documents are submitted to lenders or registries.

What Has to be Proven to Convict

For the Crown to find you guilty of mortgage or related frauds, they must demonstrate beyond a reasonable doubtThe standard that must be exceeded to find someone guilty that "by deceit, falsehood or other fraudulent means" you defrauded another person or a company. In many cases, the Crown’s evidence will be financial records and documents, which your defence lawyer can analyze for inconsistencies. The Crown must also show that a financial loss occurred and that you purposefully committed some action to cause that to happen.

Mortgage Fraud a Hybrid Offence

Canadian courts deal with offences in three ways. A summary offenceLess-serious criminal offences is for less serious crimes such as thefts under $5,000, while an indictable offenceA more serious type of Canadian criminal offence. includes murder, sexual assault and aggravated assault. In between those two is a hybrid offenceAn offence the Crown can proceed with summarily or by indictment. which includes mortgage fraud, where the Crown can deal with it as either a summary or indictable offence.

Penalties for Mortgage Fraud

If a mortgage or related charge is treated as an indictable offence, the maximum penalty is two years behind bars. If it is treated as a summary conviction, a lesser penalty will be handed down. The one exception to this is with the charge of fraudulently registering a title, It carries a maximum penalty of a five-year prison term if it is treated as an indictable offence.

Beyond criminal charges

Mortgage fraud can also have regulatory, licensing, or civil consequences. This page focuses on criminal offences.

What the Crown Must Prove

To get a conviction, the Crown must prove every part of the offence beyond a reasonable doubt.

Section

1

Deceit, falsehood, or other fraudulent means

The Crown must prove the accused used a dishonest act — a lie, misrepresentation, or other dishonest conduct (e.g. falsified income documents, inflated property appraisal, undisclosed straw-buyer arrangement, or forged signatures on mortgage paperwork).

2

Deprivation or risk of deprivation

The dishonest act must cause actual deprivation (financial loss) or place the victim's pecuniary interest at risk — R. v. Théroux and R. v. Riesberry establish that risk of prejudice to economic interests is enough; an actual loss is not required.

3

Subjective knowledge of the dishonest act

The accused must have known the act was dishonest (subjective mens rea) — not merely have been careless or mistaken.

4

Subjective knowledge that deprivation could result

The accused must have known that the dishonest act could result in deprivation to another (or been reckless or wilfully blind to that risk) — an honest but mistaken belief that no one would be harmed can negate this element.

5

Value of the subject-matter (for classification/penalty, not guilt)

While not an element of guilt itself, the Crown must establish the value of the property/money/service affected to determine which s.380(1) penalty branch applies ($5,000 threshold) and whether the $1,000,000 mandatory-minimum threshold under s.380(1.1) is engaged.

6

Identity/attribution of the false document or statement (where s.362/366-368 charged)

Where forgery or false-pretence charges are laid alongside fraud, the Crown must also prove the accused made, used, or knowingly relied on the specific false document or statement, and that they knew it was false/forged.

A proof rule (a presumption) is a rule about evidence. It does not mean the person is automatically guilty. It means the court may treat one fact as evidence of another fact unless there is evidence pointing the other way.

Possible Penalties

These are maximum sentences. Actual sentences depend on the facts, criminal history, and any mitigating or aggravating circumstances.

Fraud over $5,000, or involving a testamentary instrument — s. 380(1)(a)

Indictable
Maximum penalty
14 years
How it proceeds
Indictable only

The primary Criminal Code charge for mortgage fraud — for example falsified income, employment, down-payment source, or property value on a mortgage application. Mandatory minimum as written: where the Crown proceeds by indictment and the total value of the subject-matter exceeds $1,000,000, s. 380(1.1) requires a minimum punishment of two years of imprisonment. Some mandatory minimum sentences have been challenged under the Charter. This page summarizes the Criminal Code wording, but a lawyer can advise how the law may apply in a specific case.

Fraud where the value does not exceed $5,000 — s. 380(1)(b)

Hybrid
Maximum penalty (by indictment)
2 years
How it proceeds
Crown may proceed by indictment or summary conviction

No mandatory minimum applies. On summary conviction, the general s. 787(1) default applies: a fine of up to $5,000, imprisonment for up to two years less a day, or both.

False pretence or false statement — for example a false written statement of financial condition to obtain a mortgage loan — s. 362

Hybrid
Maximum penalty (by indictment)
10 years
How it proceeds
Crown may proceed by indictment or summary conviction

False pretence under s. 362(1)(a) is value-tiered like fraud; the false-statement offences under s. 362(1)(b)–(d) are hybrid under s. 362(3), with a 10-year maximum by indictment. No mandatory minimum applies. On summary conviction, the general s. 787(1) default applies: a fine of up to $5,000, imprisonment for up to two years less a day, or both.

What these words mean
Indictable
The more serious way to prosecute an offence. It can carry higher maximum penalties.
Summary conviction
The less serious, usually faster way to prosecute an offence, with lower maximum penalties.
Hybrid
An offence the Crown can prosecute either way — by indictment or by summary conviction.
Summary only
Summary-only offences are prosecuted by summary conviction. The Criminal Code sets the maximum penalty in the specific offence section.
Crown election
The Crown prosecutor’s choice of which way to proceed on a hybrid offence.

Possible Defences and Legal Issues

This page covers more than one section. Possible defences and legal issues are set out by section below.

Mortgage Fraud — s.380

Section 380 does not list a special defence in the Criminal Code. The Crown still has to prove the parts of the offence, including that the accused used deceit, falsehood, or other fraudulent means, that this caused or risked causing deprivation of property, money, or valuable security, and that the accused acted with intent to defraud. The other property-and-title provisions commonly used in mortgage-fraud cases -- false pretence or false statement (s.362), forgery-related offences (ss.367, 368), and the title/receipt provisions (ss.385–388, 390) -- likewise do not list a special defence.

Possible issues may still depend on the facts, the evidence, and whether the Crown can prove each part of the offence, including identity, intent, and whether a real risk of loss existed. This is general legal information, not legal advice.

Forgery — s.366(5)

Section 366(5) contains an express exception: "No person commits forgery by reason only that the person, in good faith, makes a false document at the request of a police force, the Canadian Forces or a department or agency of the federal government or of a provincial government." This means good-faith conduct at the request of one of those bodies may fall outside the forgery offence, but only if the facts fit this narrow exception. The Crown still has to prove the other elements of forgery, including that the document was false and made with the intent described in s.366(1).

Fraudulent Disposal of Goods — s.389(2)

Section 389(2) limits when a person can be convicted under s.389(1). It says: "No person is guilty of an offence under this section where, before disposing of anything in a manner that is different from and inconsistent with any agreement that has been made in that behalf between him and the consignee, he pays or tenders to the consignee the full amount of money or valuable security that the consignee has advanced." This means paying or tendering back the full amount advanced, before the inconsistent disposition, may answer this specific charge. The Crown still has to prove the other elements, including intent to deceive, defraud, or injure the consignee.

Common Legal Terms

Terms marked with a dotted underline in the article above are defined here and available in the full site glossary.

The voluntary agreement of the complainant to engage in the sexual activity in question.

Encumbrance
Glossary entry →

An interest or right to a property by someone who is not the homeowner. This will adversely affects a real property's use and value.

Hybrid offence
Glossary entry →

A hybrid offence is an offence where the Crown can choose whether to proceed by summary conviction or by indictment. The choice can affect the procedure, possible penalties, and sometimes the court where the case is heard.

Indictable offence
Glossary entry →

An indictable offence is generally a more serious type of Canadian criminal offence. Some indictable matters have higher maximum penalties and may involve different court procedures, including election about the mode of trial in some cases.

Reasonable doubt
Glossary entry →

The Supreme Court of Canada has said that reasonable doubt “falls much closer to absolute certainty than to proof on a balance of probabilities” and “that something less than absolute certainty is required, and that something more than probable guilt is required."

Summary conviction
Glossary entry →

Summary convictions are used for lesser offences with penalties, fines and short jail time. They reflect the majority of offences as defined in the Code.

Summary offence
Glossary entry →

Summary offences are less-serious criminal offences such as disturbing the peace or unlawful assembly

Legal sources

The official statute section(s) this page is based on. Always confirm against the official source before relying on it.

  • Criminal Code s. 380 Fraud (including the s. 380(1.1) minimum for value over $1,000,000)
    Source current to: 2026-05-26
    View official source ↗
  • Criminal Code s. 362 False pretence or false statement
    Source current to: 2026-05-26
    View official source ↗
  • Criminal Code s. 366 Forgery — commonly co-charged
    Source current to: 2026-05-26
    View official source ↗
  • Criminal Code s. 367 Punishment for forgery
    Source current to: 2026-05-26
    View official source ↗
  • Criminal Code s. 368 Use, trafficking or possession of forged document
    Source current to: 2026-05-26
    View official source ↗
  • Criminal Code s. 385 Fraudulent concealment of title documents — source-only reference
    Source current to: 2026-05-26
    View official source ↗
  • Criminal Code s. 386 Fraudulent registration of title — source-only reference
    Source current to: 2026-05-26
    View official source ↗
  • Criminal Code s. 387 Fraudulent sale of real property — source-only reference
    Source current to: 2026-05-26
    View official source ↗
  • Criminal Code s. 388 Misleading receipt — source-only reference
    Source current to: 2026-05-26
    View official source ↗
  • Criminal Code s. 389 Fraudulent disposal of goods on which money advanced — source-only reference
    Source current to: 2026-05-26
    View official source ↗
  • Criminal Code s. 390 Fraudulent receipts under Bank Act — source-only reference
    Source current to: 2026-05-26
    View official source ↗

Government References

Find a Criminal Defence Lawyer Near You

If you or someone you know is facing criminal charges, a criminal defence lawyer can review the situation and explain the options.

Search the Lawyer Directory

Criminal Code Help does not endorse or recommend specific lawyers.

Report an inaccuracy or concern about this page

Report an inaccuracy or concern about this page

Report: Mortgage Fraud

Use this form to report a possible error, outdated information, unclear wording, broken link, or other concern about this page.

This form is for page concerns only. Do not send confidential case details or legal questions.

Fields marked with * are required.

What are you reporting?
Please include the sentence, section, or issue you are concerned about.
Optional. You may include a link to legislation, a court decision, or another reliable source.
Optional.
Optional. Include your email only if you are willing to be contacted about this report.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.