Hijacking
Aircraft hijacking (also known as skyjacking or aircraft piracy) is the unlawful seizure of an aircraft by an individual or a group.
Jump to section
Plain-Language Summary
Hijacking: Following a spate of international incidents of air piracy, s.76 was added to the Criminal CodeA federal act codifying most criminal offences in Canada in 1972, making it illegal for anyone to use force or the threat of force to seize control of a civil aircraftAll aircraft other than those operated by Canadian enforcement agencies. It is considered one of the most serious criminal offences. Penalties for hijacking include life imprisonment. It does not matter if the aircraft was in Canadian airspace at the time of the hijacking, as international conventions dictate that the laws of the country where the plane is registered apply in any airspace an aircraft is in at the time of the incident.
What is Hijacking?
Aircraft hijacking (also known as skyjacking, plane hijacking, plane jacking, air robbery, air piracy or aircraft piracy) is the unlawful seizure of an aircraft by an individual or a group. Most cases involve the pilot being forced to fly according to the hijacker's demands. Unlike carjacking or sea piracy, an aircraft hijacking is not usually committed for financial gain, but often for political or personal reasons.
The Federal Court of Appeal (Parminder Singh Saini v. Law Society of Upper Canada, 2010 ONLSHP 5 (CanLII) noted that "hijacking is considered to be among the most serious of criminal offences. It may combine, in one act, numerous offences including kidnapping, unlawful confinement, theft, assault, extortion, and potentially murder - hijacking is not the mere seizure of an aircraft for its own sake; it exploits control over the aircraft as a weapon of psychological coercion and extortion directed against governments."
In 1972, s.76 was added to the Criminal Code, making it illegal for anyone to use force or the threat of force to seize control of an aircraft. Onboard planes, it is also a crime to:
- confine or imprison someone against their will;
- cause anyone to be transported against their will to any place other than the next scheduled place of landing;
- hold any person onboard the aircraft for ransom or to service against his will; or
- cause the aircraft to deviate from its flight plan.
What is Needed to Convict
Since a hijacking happens in a confined space – the body of an aircraft – the identity, motives and actions of the perpetrator are not difficult issues to prove in court. It also does not matter if the aircraft was in Canadian air space at the time of the hijacking, as international conventions have deemed that the laws of the country the plane is registered in apply in whatever air space an aircraft is in at the time.
Hijacking is an Indictable Offence
If you have been charged with hijacking the Crown will prosecute it as an indictable offence and you will likely be imprisoned if convicted.
Penalty for Hijacking
Hijacking is always treated as an indictable offenceA more serious type of Canadian criminal offence. with a maximum penalty of imprisonment for life.
What the Crown Must Prove
To get a conviction, the Crown must prove every part of the offence beyond a reasonable doubt.
Section
Unlawful act
The accused acted unlawfully (without lawful authority or justification) — 'unlawfully' is an express element of the offence.
Force, threat of force, or other intimidation
The seizure or exercise of control was carried out by force or threat of force, or by any other form of intimidation.
Seizure or exercise of control of an aircraft
The accused seized the aircraft or exercised control over it — either act satisfies this element.
Specific intent — one of four listed purposes
The accused acted with intent to: (a) confine or imprison a person on board against their will; (b) transport a person on board against their will to a place other than the aircraft's next scheduled landing place; (c) hold a person on board for ransom or to service against their will; or (d) cause the aircraft to deviate materially from its flight plan. Only one of the four intents needs to be proven.
Aircraft is the object of the offence
The subject of the seizure/control is an aircraft (as opposed to a vessel, vehicle, or other conveyance — hijacking under s.76 is aircraft-specific under the current Code).
A proof rule (a presumption) is a rule about evidence. It does not mean the person is automatically guilty. It means the court may treat one fact as evidence of another fact unless there is evidence pointing the other way.
Possible Penalties
These are maximum sentences. Actual sentences depend on the facts, criminal history, and any mitigating or aggravating circumstances.
Hijacking an aircraft — seizing or exercising control of an aircraft by force, threats, or any other form of intimidation — s. 76
IndictableNo mandatory minimum applies.
What these words mean
- Indictable
- The more serious way to prosecute an offence. It can carry higher maximum penalties.
- Summary conviction
- The less serious, usually faster way to prosecute an offence, with lower maximum penalties.
- Hybrid
- An offence the Crown can prosecute either way — by indictment or by summary conviction.
- Summary only
- Summary-only offences are prosecuted by summary conviction. The Criminal Code sets the maximum penalty in the specific offence section.
- Crown election
- The Crown prosecutor’s choice of which way to proceed on a hybrid offence.
Possible Defences and Legal Issues
Hijacking — s.76
Section 76 does not list a special defence in the Criminal Code. The Crown still has to prove the parts of the offence. Depending on the charge, this may mean proving that the person unlawfully seized or exercised control of an aircraft by force, threat of force, or another form of intimidation, and did so with one of the purposes the section lists, such as confining someone against their will or causing the aircraft to deviate from its flight plan.
Possible issues may still depend on the facts, the evidence, and whether the Crown can prove each part of the offence. This is general legal information, not legal advice.
Common Legal Terms
Terms marked with a dotted underline in the article above are defined here and available in the full site glossary.
- Indictable offence Glossary entry →
- A more serious type of Canadian criminal offence.
Legal sources
The official statute section(s) this page is based on. Always confirm against the official source before relying on it.
-
Criminal Code s. 76 HijackingSource current to: 2026-05-26View official source ↗
Government References
Find a Criminal Defence Lawyer Near You
If you or someone you know is facing criminal charges, a criminal defence lawyer can review the situation and explain the options.
Search the Lawyer DirectoryCriminal Code Help does not endorse or recommend specific lawyers.
Report an inaccuracy or concern about this page
Report an inaccuracy or concern about this page
Report: Hijacking
Use this form to report a possible error, outdated information, unclear wording, broken link, or other concern about this page.
General legal information only. Not legal advice. We do our best to keep this page accurate and up to date, but criminal law can change and every case depends on its facts. Check the review date and consult the Criminal Code or a criminal defence lawyer before relying on this information.
About this page
Criminal Code Help explains selected Criminal Code offences and related legal concepts in plain language. The goal is to help readers understand the general meaning of the law without having to read the full statutory text.
This page is a simplified summary. It does not include every exception, definition, court interpretation, evidentiary issue, Charter issue, sentencing factor, or procedural rule that may apply in a real case.
Legal information, not legal advice
This page is general legal information only. It is not legal advice and should not be relied on as advice about any specific charge, investigation, court file, or personal situation.
Possible defences and legal issues depend on the facts, the evidence, the exact charge, current Canadian law, and the province or territory where the case is being handled. If you are facing a criminal charge or researching a real legal problem, speak with a criminal defence lawyer in your province or territory.