Administration of Justice Criminal Code, s. 129 Hybrid

Resisting Arrest

Resisting arrest occurs when a person interferes in an officer's attempt to perform an arrest. Does not apply to passively uncooperative behaviour.

Last reviewed: July 2026 Section: Criminal Code, s. 129 Classification: Hybrid
Jump to section

Plain-Language Summary

Resisting Arrest: What This Charge Covers

Resisting arrest means physically fighting back against, or on purpose getting in the way of, a peace officer doing their job lawfully. The officer must be acting lawfully. There is no minimum penalty. The longest sentence is 2 years. Less serious cases can bring up to 2 years less a day, a $5,000 fine, or both.

Resisting Arrest: You can be charged with resisting arrestInterfering with a peace officer's lawful arrest. if you physically resist a peace officer when they are lawfully seeking to apprehend you or if you fail to assist a peace officer in an arrest without having a reasonable excuse. A conviction can result in a jail term of up to two years, but the onus is on the prosecution to show the arrest was lawful and necessary.

What is Resisting Arrest?

Resisting arrest occurs when a person interferes in a peace officerPeople involved in upholding justice's attempt to perform a lawful arrest. You have to display more than just passively uncooperative behaviour. You must show active physical resistance. It should be noted that the onus is on the officer to show they were properly carrying out their duties by trying to put you under arrest.

Section 129 of the Criminal Code lists three occasions when this charge may be laid.

  • If you resist or wilfully obstruct a public officer or peace officer in the execution of their duties, or if you wilfully obstruct any other person lawfully acting in aid of such an officer.
  • If you omit without "reasonable excuse" to assist a public officer or peace officer in arresting a person or in preserving the peace.
  • If you resist or wilfully obstruct any person in the lawful execution of a process against lands or goods or in making a lawful distress or seizure.

Who is Considered a Peace Officer?

Section 2 of the Criminal Code defines a peace officer to include the following categories:

  • a mayor, warden, reeve, sheriff, deputy sheriff, sheriff's officer, and justice of the peace;
  • a member of the Correctional Service of Canada designated as a peace officer pursuant to Part I of the Corrections and Conditional Release Act, and a warden, deputy warden, instructor, keeper, jailer, guard, and any other officer or permanent employee of a prison other than a penitentiary as defined in Part I of the Corrections and Conditional Release Act;
  • a police officer, police constable, bailiff, constable, or other person employed for the preservation and maintenance of the public peace or for the service or execution of civil process;
  • a designated officer as defined in the Integrated Cross-border Law Enforcement Operations Act when participating in an integrated cross-border operation or engaging in an activity incidental to such an operation;
  • an officer within the meaning of the Customs Act, the Excise Act, or the Excise Act, 2001, or a person having the powers of such an officer, when performing any duty in the administration of any of those Acts;
  • an officer authorized under subsection 138(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act;
  • a person designated as a fishery guardian under the Fisheries Act when performing duties under that Act, and a person designated as a fishery officer under the Fisheries Act when performing duties under that Act or the Coastal Fisheries Protection Act;
  • the pilot in command of an aircraft registered in Canada under the Aeronautics Act, or leased without crew and operated by a qualified person under that Act, while the aircraft is in flight; and
  • officers and non-commissioned members of the Canadian Forces appointed under section 156 of the National Defence Act or employed on duties prescribed by the Governor in Council as necessitating peace officer powers.

Can I Lawfully Resist Arrest?

It is always a good idea to cooperate with police and not physically resist if they want to arrest you. Keep in mind that officers may make an arrest as long as they are satisfied a person has or is about to commit an offence. However, there have been cases where the courts have found officers were not justified in their actions.

In resisting-arrest cases, important issues can include whether the officer was acting lawfully, whether the person was actively resisting, whether the force used was reasonable in the circumstances, and whether the evidence about the arrest is reliable. These issues depend heavily on the specific facts, including what happened before, during, and after the arrest.

Punishment for Resisting Arrest?

If the Crown prosecutes this charge as an indictable offenceA more serious type of Canadian criminal offence. the maximum punishment cannot exceed two years, with less severe penalties given if the charge is treated as a summary convictionUsed for lesser offences.

What else s. 129 covers

Section 129 also covers resisting or wilfully obstructing a person in the lawful execution of a process against lands or goods, or in making a lawful distress or seizure (s. 129(c)) — a civil-enforcement situation rather than an arrest. This page focuses on the arrest-related scenarios.

Not to be confused with

Assaulting a peace officer (s. 270) is a separate and more serious offence. Failures to attend court or to comply with release conditions are dealt with under s. 145. See the related offences for this page.

What the Crown Must Prove

To get a conviction, the Crown must prove every part of the offence beyond a reasonable doubt.

Section

1

Officer status

The person obstructed/resisted was a public officer or peace officer (or a person lawfully acting in aid of such an officer) at the relevant time.

2

Execution of duty

The officer was acting in the execution of their duty (i.e., the arrest, detention, or other action was lawful) at the time of the resistance or obstruction.

3

Act of resisting or wilfully obstructing

The accused resisted or wilfully obstructed the officer — mere passive non-cooperation may not suffice; the Crown must show active resistance/obstruction, and that it was wilful (intentional), not accidental.

4

Identity

The accused is the person who committed the act in question.

5

Alternative branch — omission to assist

For s.129(b): the accused, without reasonable excuse, omitted to assist a public officer or peace officer in arresting a person or preserving the peace, after having reasonable notice that assistance was required.

6

No lawful justification/excuse

The accused's conduct was not otherwise legally justified (e.g., the underlying arrest/action was itself unlawful, giving rise to a defence) and, for the omission branch, there was no reasonable excuse for failing to assist.

A proof rule (a presumption) is a rule about evidence. It does not mean the person is automatically guilty. It means the court may treat one fact as evidence of another fact unless there is evidence pointing the other way.

Possible Penalties

These are maximum sentences. Actual sentences depend on the facts, criminal history, and any mitigating or aggravating circumstances.

Resisting or wilfully obstructing a public officer or peace officer in the execution of their duty — s. 129(a)

Hybrid
Maximum penalty (by indictment)
2 years
How it proceeds
Crown may proceed by indictment or summary conviction

No mandatory minimum applies. On summary conviction, the general s. 787(1) default applies: a fine of up to $5,000, imprisonment for up to two years less a day, or both.

Failing, without reasonable excuse, to assist an officer in making an arrest or preserving the peace after reasonable notice — s. 129(b)

Hybrid
Maximum penalty (by indictment)
2 years
How it proceeds
Crown may proceed by indictment or summary conviction

No mandatory minimum applies. On summary conviction, the general s. 787(1) default applies: a fine of up to $5,000, imprisonment for up to two years less a day, or both.

Resisting or wilfully obstructing a person lawfully authorized to act in aid of an officer — s. 129(a)

Hybrid
Maximum penalty (by indictment)
2 years
How it proceeds
Crown may proceed by indictment or summary conviction

No mandatory minimum applies. On summary conviction, the general s. 787(1) default applies: a fine of up to $5,000, imprisonment for up to two years less a day, or both.

What these words mean
Indictable
The more serious way to prosecute an offence. It can carry higher maximum penalties.
Summary conviction
The less serious, usually faster way to prosecute an offence, with lower maximum penalties.
Hybrid
An offence the Crown can prosecute either way — by indictment or by summary conviction.
Summary only
Summary-only offences are prosecuted by summary conviction. The Criminal Code sets the maximum penalty in the specific offence section.
Crown election
The Crown prosecutor’s choice of which way to proceed on a hybrid offence.

Possible Defences and Legal Issues

This page covers more than one section. Possible defences and legal issues are set out by section below.

Resisting Arrest — s.129(a)

Section 129(a) does not list a special defence in the Criminal Code for resisting or wilfully obstructing a public officer or peace officer. The Crown still has to prove the parts of the offence, including that the officer was "in the execution of his duty", and that the accused "resists or wilfully obstructs" the officer (or a person lawfully acting in aid of the officer). Whether the officer was acting lawfully at the time is part of what the Crown must prove.

Possible issues may still depend on the facts, the evidence, and whether the Crown can prove each part of the offence. This is general legal information, not legal advice.

Resisting Arrest — Failing to Assist an Officer, s.129(b)

Section 129(b) covers a separate branch of the offence: a person who "omits, without reasonable excuse, to assist a public officer or peace officer" who is arresting someone or preserving the peace, after having reasonable notice that they are required to do so. Because "without reasonable excuse" is part of the offence, if there is evidence capable of raising a reasonable excuse, the Crown must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the person omitted to assist without reasonable excuse. What counts as a reasonable excuse depends on the facts and the law.

Common Legal Terms

Terms marked with a dotted underline in the article above are defined here and available in the full site glossary.

Indictable offence
Glossary entry →

An indictable offence is generally a more serious type of Canadian criminal offence. Some indictable matters have higher maximum penalties and may involve different court procedures, including election about the mode of trial in some cases.

Peace officer
Glossary entry →

A peace office can be a mayor, warden, reeve, sheriff, deputy sheriff, sheriff’s officer, justice of the peace, prison warden or a police officer.  It can also be a pilot in charge of an aircraft when it is in flight.

Summary conviction
Glossary entry →

Summary convictions are used for lesser offences with penalties, fines and short jail time. They reflect the majority of offences as defined in the Code.

Legal sources

The official statute section(s) this page is based on. Always confirm against the official source before relying on it.

  • Criminal Code s. 129 Offences relating to public or peace officer
    Source current to: 2026-05-26
    View official source ↗
  • Criminal Code s. 787 General summary-conviction penalty (default; s. 129 states no summary maximum)
    Source current to: 2026-05-26
    View official source ↗

Government References

Find a Criminal Defence Lawyer Near You

If you or someone you know is facing criminal charges, a criminal defence lawyer can review the situation and explain the options.

Search the Lawyer Directory

Criminal Code Help does not endorse or recommend specific lawyers.

Report an inaccuracy or concern about this page

Report an inaccuracy or concern about this page

Report: Resisting Arrest

Use this form to report a possible error, outdated information, unclear wording, broken link, or other concern about this page.

This form is for page concerns only. Do not send confidential case details or legal questions.

Fields marked with * are required.

What are you reporting?
Please include the sentence, section, or issue you are concerned about.
Optional. You may include a link to legislation, a court decision, or another reliable source.
Optional.
Optional. Include your email only if you are willing to be contacted about this report.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.