Administration of Justice Criminal Code, s. 130 Hybrid

Personating a Peace Officer or Public Officer

Personating a peace officer or public officer (Criminal Code section 130) explained in plain language: what it means, what the Crown must prove, and the possible penalties.

Last reviewed: July 2026 Section: Criminal Code, s. 130 Classification: Hybrid
Jump to section

Plain-Language Summary

Personating a Peace Officer or Public Officer: What Counts as the Offence

Personating a peace officer or public officer means falsely claiming to be one. The Crown must prove you made that false claim. This offence can be charged by indictment or summary conviction. The longest sentence by indictment is 5 years in prison. There is no minimum sentence.

It is a criminal offenceA criminal activity to pretend to be a police officer or another official the law calls a public officer, or to use a badge, uniform, or equipment in a way that is likely to make people believe you are one. People often search for this as "impersonation," but the Criminal CodeA federal act codifying most criminal offences in Canada calls it "personation."

What this offence is

The Criminal Code makes it an offence to personate a peace officerPeople involved in upholding justice or a public officerA public official included in the Criminal Code definition, such as certain customs, military, RCMP, or revenue officers.. Most people call this "impersonating a police officer," but the law uses the word "personation."

A "peace officer" includes police officers and certain other officials the Criminal Code lists. A "public officer" is also a defined term in the Criminal Code. It does not mean every government employee. It refers to specific kinds of officials set out in the law.

This offence can apply in two main ways:

  • falsely representing yourself to be a peace officer or a public officer; or
  • using a badge, or an article of uniform or equipment, in a way that is likely to make people believe you are a peace officer or a public officer, even if you do not say so in words.

This is different from identity theft or identity fraud, which deal with using another person's identity information. It is also different from assaulting a peace officer. Those are separate offences with their own pages.

What the prosecutor has to prove

"The Crown" is the prosecutor, the government lawyer who brings the charge. To convict you of this offence, the prosecutor must prove, beyond a reasonable doubtThe standard that must be exceeded to find someone guilty, that:

  1. you falsely represented yourself to be a peace officer or a public officer, or you used a badge, uniform, or equipment in a way that is likely to make people believe you were one; and
  2. you did not have the officer status you represented or suggested.

Examples of conduct that may lead to a charge

These are general examples only. Whether any situation leads to a charge depends on the facts and the evidence.

  • Telling someone you are a police officer when you are not.
  • Wearing a police-style uniform or displaying a badge to make people think you have police authority.
  • Using flashing lights or equipment to make people believe you are an officer carrying out official duties.

How this offence is prosecuted

Canada deals with criminal charges in two main ways:

  • Summary convictionUsed for lesser offences: the process used for less serious cases, with lower maximum penalties.
  • Indictable: the process used for more serious cases, with higher maximum penalties.

Personating a peace officer or public officer is a hybrid offence, which means the prosecutor chooses which of those two ways to proceed, based on the case. The maximum penalty is higher if the prosecutor proceeds by indictment.

Possible penalties

If the prosecutor proceeds by indictment, the maximum is 5 years in prison.

If the prosecutor proceeds by summary conviction, the general summary-conviction rules apply unless another law provides otherwise. Under those general rules, the maximum is a fine of up to $5,000, imprisonment of up to two years less a day, or both.

Possible legal issues if you are accused

The Criminal Code does not set out a specific written defence to this offence. Whether a defence applies depends on the facts and the evidence.

Possible legal issues may include whether the prosecutor can prove that a representation was made, that it was false, or that the conduct was likely to make people believe you were an officer. Charter issues or other legal issues may also matter in some cases. These are not automatic defences.

Related charges

Some charges are often confused with personating an officer but are separate offences with their own rules and penalties. Examples may include identity theft and identity fraud, fraud, and assaulting a peace officer.

Those offences should be checked on their own pages.

What the Crown Must Prove

To get a conviction, the Crown must prove every part of the offence beyond a reasonable doubt.

Section

1

False representation or use of badge/uniform/equipment

That the accused either (a) falsely represented themselves to be a peace officer or a public officer, or (b) not being a peace officer or public officer, used a badge or an article of uniform or equipment in a manner likely to cause persons to believe the accused was a peace officer or public officer.

2

Accused was not, in fact, that officer

That the accused was not actually a peace officer or public officer of the kind represented or suggested (the representation or impression created was false).

3

Likelihood of belief (badge/uniform/equipment branch)

For the s.130(1)(b) route specifically, that the manner of use of the badge, uniform, or equipment was likely to cause persons to believe the accused was a peace officer or public officer -- an objective likelihood standard, not proof that anyone was actually deceived.

4

Identity of the accused

That it was the accused who made the false representation or engaged in the conduct with the badge, uniform, or equipment.

A proof rule (a presumption) is a rule about evidence. It does not mean the person is automatically guilty. It means the court may treat one fact as evidence of another fact unless there is evidence pointing the other way.

Possible Penalties

These are maximum sentences. Actual sentences depend on the facts, criminal history, and any mitigating or aggravating circumstances.

Personating a peace officer or public officer — s. 130

Hybrid
Maximum penalty (by indictment)
5 years
How it proceeds
Crown may proceed by indictment or summary conviction

No mandatory minimum applies. On summary conviction, the general s. 787(1) default applies: a fine of up to $5,000, imprisonment for up to two years less a day, or both.

What these words mean
Indictable
The more serious way to prosecute an offence. It can carry higher maximum penalties.
Summary conviction
The less serious, usually faster way to prosecute an offence, with lower maximum penalties.
Hybrid
An offence the Crown can prosecute either way — by indictment or by summary conviction.
Summary only
Summary-only offences are prosecuted by summary conviction. The Criminal Code sets the maximum penalty in the specific offence section.
Crown election
The Crown prosecutor’s choice of which way to proceed on a hybrid offence.

Sentencing Factors

Things a court may treat as making the offence more serious when it decides a sentence. These are not separate offences.

Personation to facilitate another offence — aggravating circumstance s. 130.1

If a person personates a peace officer for the purpose of facilitating another offence, s. 130.1 requires the court to treat that as an aggravating circumstance at sentencing.

If a person is convicted of an offence under section 130, the court imposing the sentence on the person shall consider as an aggravating circumstance the fact that the accused personated a peace officer or a public officer, as the case may be, for the purpose of facilitating the commission of another offence.
View official source ↗

Possible Defences and Legal Issues

Personating a Peace Officer — s. 130

Section 130 does not list a special defence in the Criminal Code. The Crown still has to prove the parts of the offence. Depending on the charge, this may mean proving that the person falsely represented themselves to be a peace officer or a public officer. For the badge, uniform, or equipment branch of the offence, the Crown must prove the person was not a peace officer or public officer and used a badge, article of uniform, or equipment in a way likely to make people believe they were a peace officer or public officer.

Possible issues may still depend on the facts, the evidence, and whether the Crown can prove each part of the offence. This is general legal information, not legal advice.

Common Legal Terms

Terms marked with a dotted underline in the article above are defined here and available in the full site glossary.

Peace officer
Glossary entry →

A peace office can be a mayor, warden, reeve, sheriff, deputy sheriff, sheriff’s officer, justice of the peace, prison warden or a police officer.  It can also be a pilot in charge of an aircraft when it is in flight.

Reasonable doubt
Glossary entry →

The Supreme Court of Canada has said that reasonable doubt “falls much closer to absolute certainty than to proof on a balance of probabilities” and “that something less than absolute certainty is required, and that something more than probable guilt is required."

Summary conviction
Glossary entry →

Summary convictions are used for lesser offences with penalties, fines and short jail time. They reflect the majority of offences as defined in the Code.

Legal sources

The official statute section(s) this page is based on. Always confirm against the official source before relying on it.

  • Criminal Code s. 130 Personating peace officer
    Source current to: 2026-05-26
    View official source ↗
  • Criminal Code s. 130.1 Aggravating circumstance — personation to facilitate another offence
    Source current to: 2026-05-26
    View official source ↗
  • Criminal Code s. 2 Definitions of 'peace officer' and 'public officer'
    Source current to: 2026-05-26
    View official source ↗
  • Criminal Code s. 787 General summary-conviction penalty (default; s. 130 states no summary maximum)
    Source current to: 2026-05-26
    View official source ↗

Find a Criminal Defence Lawyer Near You

If you or someone you know is facing criminal charges, a criminal defence lawyer can review the situation and explain the options.

Search the Lawyer Directory

Criminal Code Help does not endorse or recommend specific lawyers.

Report an inaccuracy or concern about this page

Report an inaccuracy or concern about this page

Report: Personating a Peace Officer or Public Officer

Use this form to report a possible error, outdated information, unclear wording, broken link, or other concern about this page.

This form is for page concerns only. Do not send confidential case details or legal questions.

Fields marked with * are required.

What are you reporting?
Please include the sentence, section, or issue you are concerned about.
Optional. You may include a link to legislation, a court decision, or another reliable source.
Optional.
Optional. Include your email only if you are willing to be contacted about this report.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.