Elder Abuse
It is considered Elder Abuse if you interfere with an older adult's decision-making ability and any physical, sexual, emotional and financial abuse.
Jump to section
Plain-Language Summary
Elder Abuse comes in various forms and can include physical, sexual, financial and emotional abuse. There is no specific crime of elder abuseAny sort of abuse of those 65 years and older in the Criminal CodeA federal act codifying most criminal offences in Canada, and constitutional jurisdiction is shared between the provincial/territorial and federal governments. Instead, several sections of the Code can deal with cases where older people are harmed, including manslaughter, failure to provide the necessities of life, and sexual assaultApplying force, threatening force, or causing someone to believe force will be used without consent.. You could face life in prison if convicted, depending on the section of the Code.
What is Elder Abuse?
According to the Canadian Network for the Prevention of Elder Abuse (CNPEA), crimes against the elderly can include sexual, systematic, financial or emotional abuse, neglect and violations of rights and freedoms.
Sexual abuse can occur if the victim is forced to engage in sexual activity, which can include verbal or suggestive behaviour or touching.
Systemic abuse is also known as institutional abuse and refers to policies, practices or regulations that harm or discriminate against the elderly.
Financial abuse is any effort to threaten, trick or persuade elderly adults out of their possessions and can include misusing a power of attorney.
If you threaten, intimidate, insult or humiliate an elderly person this would be considered emotional abuse, and includes treating the victim as a child or not allowing them to see their family and friends, according to the CNPEA.
Failing to provide the necessaries of life, such as medical care, food and shelter would be considered neglect even if it is not intentional.
It is considered a violation of rights and freedoms if you interfere with an older adult's ability to make choices, especially when those choices are protected under the law, such as traditions or spiritual practices. The CNPEA notes denying privacy, preventing visitors, dictating how the person can spend their money or withholding mail or information can be considered violations.
Different sections of the Code can be used to prosecute elder abuse:
Charges Used to Prosecute Elder Abuse
According to the DoJ, the offence in the Criminal Code that comes the closest to creating an offence of elder neglect is covered under s.215 (1)(c) that creates an explicit duty on the part of a caregiver to provide the necessaries of life. However, other sections would also deal with crimes that cause harm to older individuals.
Failure to Provide the Necessaries of Life
Section 215 of the Code establishes a legal duty for everyone to provide necessaries of life to a person under his or her charge if that person "is unable, by reason of detention, age, illness, mental disorder or other cause, to withdraw himself from that charge." If this charge is prosecuted as an indictable offence the maximum penalty is a five-year prison term or a less harsh sentence if it is prosecuted as a summary conviction.
Manslaughter
Manslaughter is covered under s.236 of the Code and states that If you commit an unlawful act that causes the death of another person you could be convicted and imprisoned for life. Death is not planned and there was no intent to kill. There is no mandatory minimum sentence unless a firearm was used, in which case the minimum jail term is four years in prison.
Robbery
Section 343 of the Code makes it illegal to commit theft while using, or threatening to use, physical force. Robbery is always treated as an indictable offence, with a maximum sentence of imprisonment for life. If a restricted or prohibited firearm is used, or any firearm is used for the benefit of or at the direction of a criminal organization, a mandatory minimum sentence of five years applies (seven years for a second or subsequent offence). In other cases there is no mandatory minimum.
Sexual assault
The DoJ describes sexual assault as "any unwanted sexual act done by one person to another or sexual activity without one person's consentVoluntary agreement to engage in an sexual act or voluntary agreement." Under s.271 (1) if you are convicted you face imprisonment for up to 10 years. If the charges proceed as a summary conviction you could be jailed for up to 18 months.
Fraud
Section 380 of the Code states that if you are found guilty of fraud over $5,000 it will be treated as an indictable offence with a maximum penalty of 14 years in prison. If the fraud exceeded $1 million, the minimum penalty you can face is two years in jail. If the alleged fraud is valued at less than $5,000, the Crown has the option of treating the charge as a summary conviction with a less severe penalty imposed.
Assault
The Criminal Code deals with the charge of assault starting at s.265 and states that you can face prosecution if you apply intentional force directly or indirectly on a victim without their consent. A threat that causes someone to believe they may suffer a physical injury may also result in an assault charge.There are several levels of assault, starting with simple or common assault and a wide range of penalties. If you are convicted of simple assault on summary conviction you face a maximum sentence of two years less a day in jail and/or a $5,000 fine. Aggravated assault brings a maximum sentence of 14 years in jail.
Theft
Section 322 of the Code makes it an offence to take property from others without their consent, unless you honestly believe it is yours. There are various theft-related charges that cover elderly abuse including s.331, which makes it a crime for someone holding power of attorney to fraudulently sell, mortgage, pledge or otherwise dispose of the property of a person under their care. If more than $5,000 is stolen and the charge is treated as an indictable offence the maximum punishment is a 10-year prison term. The sentence is less harsh for charges treated as summary convictions. If the theft was valued at less than $5,000 and the charge is treated as an indictable offence, the maximum punishment is two years in jail. The value-based classification is set by s. 334.
Uttering Threats
If you verbally threaten someone you could be charged with uttering threats under s.264.1 (1) of the Code. Threatening to cause death or bodily harm may be treated as an indictable offence with a maximum punishment of five years in prison.
Forcible Confinement
Holding someone against their will is considered forcible confinement under s.279 of the Code and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years if it is treated as an indictable offence. If the Crown proceeds as a summary conviction you would face a fine of up to $5,000 and/or imprisonment for up to two years less a day.
What is Needed to Convict
The Crown prosecutorA lawyer who conducts a criminal prosecution on behalf of the public. must prove beyond a reasonable doubtThe high standard the Crown must meet to prove guilt. that you committed the specific offence charged. This includes the act and any required intent, knowledge, or other mental element. The Crown does not have to prove a separate item called "the witness is not fabricating." The court weighs each witness's credibility when deciding whether the Crown has proved the charge. If the evidence leaves a reasonable doubt, you must be found not guilty. Any forensic evidence linking you to the crime can be challenged. Your lawyer may be able to show that your rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms were breached during a police investigation.
Treated as a Summary Conviction or Indictable Offence
Elder abuse is a hybrid offenceAn offence the Crown can proceed with summarily or by indictment., which allows the Crown to proceed with the charge as an indictable offenceA more serious type of Canadian criminal offence. or by summary convictionLess-serious criminal offences. Being found guilty of an indictable offence carries penalties that are more severe than summary conviction.
The Crown will consider such factors as the seriousness of the incident and your prior criminal record when deciding how to proceed.
According to s.718.1 of the Criminal Code, a sentence "must be proportionate to the gravity of offence and the degree of responsibility of the offender." The vulnerability of a victim by virtue of age, disability or other similar factors comes into play and may have a significant impact on sentencing, according to the DoJ.
Elder Abuse and the Criminal Code
The Criminal Code does not use 'elder abuse' as the name of one offence. Abuse or neglect of an older person may be charged under existing offences such as failure to provide necessaries of life, assault, criminal harassment, threats, forcible confinement, sexual assault, theft, fraud, robbery, or extortion, depending on the facts. The victim's age, health, financial situation, and other personal circumstances may also be relevant at sentencing.
Other offences may also apply depending on the facts, including offences involving unlawful entry into a dwelling-house.
The Criminal Code does not create one offence called elder abuse. The charge depends on what happened. The victim's age, health, financial situation, and other personal circumstances may also matter at sentencing.
Possible Penalties
These are maximum sentences. Actual sentences depend on the facts, criminal history, and any mitigating or aggravating circumstances.
Failure to provide necessaries of life — s. 215
HybridPunishment is in s. 215(3). No section-specific summary maximum — the general s. 787 default applies (fine up to $5,000 and/or imprisonment up to two years less a day); the former 18-month summary cap was removed by Bill C-75 (2019, c. 25, s. 74). The elder-relevant duty is s. 215(1)(c): a person under one's charge who is unable to withdraw from that charge and unable to provide themselves with necessaries.
Assault — s. 266
HybridAssault is defined in s. 265. No section-specific summary maximum — the general s. 787 default applies (fine up to $5,000 and/or imprisonment up to two years less a day).
Assault with a weapon, causing bodily harm, or choking — s. 267
HybridCovers carrying/using/threatening to use a weapon or imitation, causing bodily harm, and choking/suffocating/strangling (s. 267(c)). No section-specific summary maximum — the general s. 787 default applies (fine up to $5,000 and/or imprisonment up to two years less a day).
Aggravated assault — s. 268
IndictableApplies where the assault wounds, maims, disfigures or endangers the life of the complainant.
Uttering threats (death or bodily harm) — s. 264.1(1)(a)
HybridPunishment is in s. 264.1(2). No section-specific summary maximum — the general s. 787 default applies (fine up to $5,000 and/or imprisonment up to two years less a day). Threats to damage property or kill/injure an animal are a separate limb (s. 264.1(3)): also hybrid, maximum 2 years by indictment.
Criminal harassment — s. 264
HybridPunishment is in s. 264(3). No section-specific summary maximum — the general s. 787 default applies (fine up to $5,000 and/or imprisonment up to two years less a day).
Forcible confinement — s. 279(2)
HybridNo section-specific summary maximum — the general s. 787 default applies (fine up to $5,000 and/or imprisonment up to two years less a day).
Sexual assault — s. 271
Hybrids. 271(b) sets its own summary maximum — 18 months (adult complainant) — so the s. 787 default does NOT apply. The section's higher maxima and mandatory minimums (14 years / 1-year minimum by indictment; two years less a day / 6-month minimum on summary) apply only where the complainant is under 16, which cannot arise on an elder-abuse fact pattern.
Manslaughter (e.g. death resulting from an unlawful act or criminal negligence) — s. 236
IndictableMandatory minimum as written: s. 236(a) — imprisonment for four years where a firearm is used in the commission of the offence (still in force; NOT repealed by Bill C-5). In any other case (s. 236(b)) there is no mandatory minimum.
Theft over $5,000 or of a testamentary instrument (incl. theft by a person holding a power of attorney) — ss. 322/331, punished under s. 334(a)
HybridTheft is defined in s. 322; s. 331 makes it theft for a person entrusted with a power of attorney to fraudulently sell, mortgage, pledge or dispose of the property or convert the proceeds. Hybridized by Bill C-75 (2019, c. 25, s. 122). No section-specific summary maximum — the general s. 787 default applies (fine up to $5,000 and/or imprisonment up to two years less a day).
Theft not exceeding $5,000 — s. 334(b)
HybridMaximum on indictment is two years (s. 334(b)(i)). No section-specific summary maximum — the general s. 787 default applies (fine up to $5,000 and/or imprisonment up to two years less a day).
Robbery — s. 343, punished under s. 344
IndictableRobbery is defined in s. 343. Mandatory minimums as written: s. 344(1)(a) — five years (first offence) or seven years (second or subsequent) where a restricted or prohibited firearm is used, or any firearm is used in connection with a criminal organization. Former s. 344(1)(a.1) (four-year minimum for other firearm robberies) was REPEALED by Bill C-5, S.C. 2022, c. 15, s. 12 — do not list. In any other case (s. 344(1)(b)): maximum life, no mandatory minimum.
Extortion — s. 346
IndictablePunishment is in s. 346(1.1). Mandatory minimums as written: s. 346(1.1)(a) — five years (first offence) or seven years (second or subsequent) where a restricted or prohibited firearm is used, or any firearm is used in connection with a criminal organization. Former s. 346(1.1)(a.1) (four-year minimum) was REPEALED by Bill C-5, S.C. 2022, c. 15, s. 13 — do not list. In any other case (s. 346(1.1)(b)): maximum life, no mandatory minimum.
Fraud over $5,000 or on a testamentary instrument — s. 380(1)(a)
IndictableMandatory minimum as written: s. 380(1.1) — where a person is prosecuted on indictment and the total value of the subject-matter of the offences exceeds one million dollars, the court shall impose a minimum punishment of imprisonment for two years. Some mandatory minimum sentences have been challenged under the Charter. This page summarizes the Criminal Code wording, but a lawyer can advise how the law may apply in a specific case.
Fraud not exceeding $5,000 — s. 380(1)(b)
HybridNo section-specific summary maximum — the general s. 787 default applies (fine up to $5,000 and/or imprisonment up to two years less a day).
What these words mean
- Indictable
- The more serious way to prosecute an offence. It can carry higher maximum penalties.
- Summary conviction
- The less serious, usually faster way to prosecute an offence, with lower maximum penalties.
- Hybrid
- An offence the Crown can prosecute either way — by indictment or by summary conviction.
- Summary only
- Summary-only offences are prosecuted by summary conviction. The Criminal Code sets the maximum penalty in the specific offence section.
- Crown election
- The Crown prosecutor’s choice of which way to proceed on a hybrid offence.
Possible Defences and Legal Issues
This page covers more than one section. Possible defences and legal issues are set out by section below.
Elder Abuse — ss.215, 265–268, 271, 334, 344, 380
This page covers a range of offences that may arise in elder abuse cases, including failure to provide the necessaries of life, assault, sexual assault, theft, robbery, extortion, and fraud. The available legal issues depend entirely on the specific charge or charges a person is actually facing; there is no single defence that applies across every offence listed here.
For each charge, the Crown must prove every element beyond a reasonable doubt, including identity, the required mental state, and the specific acts or omissions alleged. A failure to prove any essential element means the charge is not made out. Some of the specific offences covered by this page have their own statutory wording about lawful or reasonable excuse, colour of right, or justification — see the notes below for the sections where that applies. Section 718.2(a)(iii.1) is a sentencing aggravating factor, not a defence, and it reflects that harm to vulnerable victims is taken seriously at sentencing.
These are serious allegations. The appropriate issues depend entirely on the facts and the specific offence charged, so legal review is important before drawing conclusions from a general overview.
Failure to Provide the Necessaries of Life — s.215
Section 215 creates a legal duty to provide necessaries of life to certain people, including a person under your charge who cannot withdraw from that charge because of detention, age, illness, mental disorder, or another cause. It is an offence to fail "without lawful excuse" to perform that duty where the failure endangers the person’s life or is likely to permanently endanger their health.
If there is evidence capable of raising a lawful excuse, the Crown must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the person failed to perform the duty without lawful excuse. What counts as a lawful excuse depends on the facts and the law.
Assault — ss.265–268
Section 265 defines assault, and its consent rules apply to all forms of assault under sections 265 to 268. The Criminal Code says no consent is obtained where the complainant submits or does not resist because of the application of force, threats or fear of force, fraud, or the exercise of authority. Where an accused says they believed the complainant consented, that belief is only a live issue if there is sufficient evidence to support it; if so, the jury must also consider whether there were reasonable grounds for that belief.
Whether any of this applies depends on the exact charge and the facts. This is general legal information, not legal advice.
Forcible Confinement — s.279(2)
Section 279(2) says a person who "without lawful authority, confines, imprisons or forcibly seizes another person" is guilty of forcible confinement. If there is evidence capable of raising a lawful authority for the confinement, the Crown must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the person acted without lawful authority. What counts as lawful authority depends on the facts and the law.
Theft — s.322
Theft is defined in section 322 as taking or converting property "fraudulently and without colour of right". If there is evidence capable of raising an honest claim of right to the property, the Crown must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the person acted without colour of right. Section 331 makes it theft for a person holding a power of attorney to fraudulently sell, mortgage, pledge, or otherwise dispose of property they were entrusted to manage.
Common Legal Terms
Terms marked with a dotted underline in the article above are defined here and available in the full site glossary.
- Beyond a reasonable doubt Glossary entry →
- The high standard the Crown must meet to prove guilt.
- Consent Glossary entry →
- Voluntary agreement to engage in an sexual act
- Crown prosecutor Glossary entry →
- A lawyer who conducts a criminal prosecution on behalf of the public.
- Hybrid offence Glossary entry →
- An offence the Crown can proceed with summarily or by indictment.
- Indictable offence Glossary entry →
- A more serious type of Canadian criminal offence.
- Summary offence Glossary entry →
- Less-serious criminal offences
Legal sources
The official statute section(s) this page is based on. Always confirm against the official source before relying on it.
-
Criminal Code s. 215 Main offence (failure to provide necessaries of life — duty in s. 215(1)(c),...Last reviewed by CCH: 2026-07-05View official source ↗
-
Criminal Code s. 265 Definition (assault)Source current to: 2026-05-26View official source ↗
-
Criminal Code s. 266 Main offence (assault)Source current to: 2026-05-26View official source ↗
-
Criminal Code s. 267 Main offence (assault with a weapon / causing bodily harm / choking)Source current to: 2026-05-26View official source ↗
-
Criminal Code s. 268 Main offence (aggravated assault)Source current to: 2026-05-26View official source ↗
-
Criminal Code s. 264.1 Main offence (uttering threats)Source current to: 2026-05-26View official source ↗
-
Criminal Code s. 264 Main offence (criminal harassment)Source current to: 2026-05-26View official source ↗
-
Criminal Code s. 279(2) Main offence (forcible confinement)Source current to: 2026-05-26View official source ↗
-
Criminal Code s. 271 Main offence (sexual assault)Source current to: 2026-05-26View official source ↗
-
Criminal Code s. 236 Punishment (manslaughter)Source current to: 2026-05-26View official source ↗
-
Criminal Code s. 322 Definition (theft)Source current to: 2026-05-26View official source ↗
-
Criminal Code s. 331 Definition (theft by person holding power of attorney)Source current to: 2026-05-26View official source ↗
-
Criminal Code s. 334 Punishment (theft — over / not exceeding $5,000)Source current to: 2026-05-26View official source ↗
-
Criminal Code s. 343 Definition (robbery)Source current to: 2026-05-26View official source ↗
-
Criminal Code s. 344 Punishment (robbery)Source current to: 2026-05-26View official source ↗
-
Criminal Code s. 346 Main offence (extortion — definition and punishment)Source current to: 2026-05-26View official source ↗
-
Criminal Code s. 349 Main offence (being unlawfully in a dwelling-house)Source current to: 2026-05-26View official source ↗
-
Criminal Code s. 380 Main offence (fraud — definition and punishment)Source current to: 2026-05-26View official source ↗
-
Criminal Code s. 718.2(a)(iii.1) Sentencing factor (aggravating — significant impact on the victim considering...Source current to: 2026-05-26View official source ↗
-
Criminal Code s. 787 General penalty (summary conviction default)Source current to: 2026-05-26View official source ↗
Government References
Find a Criminal Defence Lawyer Near You
If you or someone you know is facing criminal charges, a criminal defence lawyer can review the situation and explain the options.
Search the Lawyer DirectoryCriminal Code Help does not endorse or recommend specific lawyers.
Report an inaccuracy or concern about this page
Report an inaccuracy or concern about this page
Report: Elder Abuse
Use this form to report a possible error, outdated information, unclear wording, broken link, or other concern about this page.
General legal information only. Not legal advice. We do our best to keep this page accurate and up to date, but criminal law can change and every case depends on its facts. Check the review date and consult the Criminal Code or a criminal defence lawyer before relying on this information.
About this page
Criminal Code Help explains selected Criminal Code offences and related legal concepts in plain language. The goal is to help readers understand the general meaning of the law without having to read the full statutory text.
This page is a simplified summary. It does not include every exception, definition, court interpretation, evidentiary issue, Charter issue, sentencing factor, or procedural rule that may apply in a real case.
Legal information, not legal advice
This page is general legal information only. It is not legal advice and should not be relied on as advice about any specific charge, investigation, court file, or personal situation.
Possible defences and legal issues depend on the facts, the evidence, the exact charge, current Canadian law, and the province or territory where the case is being handled. If you are facing a criminal charge or researching a real legal problem, speak with a criminal defence lawyer in your province or territory.