Child Abuse
While there is no specific offence called “child abuse” in the Criminal Code, all acts of abuse against children are crimes in Canada.
Jump to section
Plain-Language Summary
Child Abuse: The Criminal CodeA federal act codifying most criminal offences in Canada does not list child abuse as a crime though many other offences could be used to charge someone with acts of family violence. Some forms of neglect are crimes in Canada, including failure to provide the necessities of life and child abandonment. Depending on the crime, penalties can include life imprisonment.
Child Abuse is a Crime in Canada
While there is no specific offence called “child abuse” in the Criminal Code, all acts of abuse against children are crimes in Canada. Physical and sexual abuse fall under general assault and sexual offence legislation, though the act of spankingPhysical discipline of a child; Canadian law allows only very limited corrective force. a child is specifically addressed. Other broad categories of child abuse are detailed below.
Spanking Could be Considered Child Abuse
Depending on the circumstances, spanking a child could be illegal, according to a Department of Justice (DoJ) document (Criminal Law and Managing Children's Behaviour.) That is because s.43 of the Code states that every schoolteacher, parent or person standing in the place of a parent "is justified in using force by way of correction toward a pupil or child, as the case may be, who is under his care, if the force does not exceed what is reasonable under the circumstances." The DoJ document adds that spanking may be considered child abuse under provincial and territorial laws and could "lead to action taken by child protection authorities." In 2004, the Supreme Court of Canada found (Canadian Foundation for Children, Youth and the Law v. Canada) that s.43 was constitutional and consistent with the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, while significantly narrowing its application, ruling that parents can only use physical punishment that is minor or "transitory and trifling" in nature. Physical punishment cannot be used on children younger than two or older than 12, and cannot be used in retaliation for something a child did. The court added that the seriousness of the child's misbehaviour is not relevant, as the force used "must be minor, no matter what the child did."
Types of Psychological Abuse
Offences related to some forms of psychological or emotional abuse of children often involve using words or actions to control, isolate, intimidate or dehumanize them. Harassment Section 264 of the Code prohibits criminal harassment. The offence requires that the conduct cause the other person, reasonably in all the circumstances, to fear for their own safety or the safety of someone they know. "Reasonably" means the fear must be objectively justifiable, not merely felt. If the charge is treated as an indictable offenceA more serious type of Canadian criminal offence. you could face up to 10 years in prison, or a less harsh sentence if the charge is treated as a summary convictionUsed for lesser offences. uttering threatsSaying, writing, or conveying a threat to kill, harm, damage property, or harm an animal. If you were to verbally threaten a child, you could be charged with uttering threats under s.264.1(1) of the Code. Threatening to cause death or bodily harm is a hybrid offenceAn offence the Crown can proceed with summarily or by indictment.: if the Crown proceeds by indictment the maximum is five years in prison; a lower sentence applies on summary conviction. If you threaten to burn, destroy or damage property, or to kill or injure an animal as part of that threat, this is also a hybrid offence: the maximum on indictment is two years in prison, with a lower sentence on summary conviction.
Forms of Neglect Within the Family
There are several Criminal Code offences related to neglect in a family context.
Failure to Provide the Necessaries of Life Section 215 of the Code makes it a legal duty for a parent, foster parent, guardian, or head of a family to provide necessaries of life for a child under 16. This charge can be laid if a failure to perform that duty endangers a child's life or causes, or is likely to cause, the child's health to be permanently injured. The Code also says that proof of one month without providing the necessaries of life to a child under 16 is treated at trial as proof of failure without lawful excuse, unless there is evidence to the contrary.
If this charge is handled as an indictable offence, the maximum penalty is five years in prison. Lower maximums apply if it is prosecuted by summary conviction.
Child Abandonment Section 218 of the Code makes it illegal to abandon a child under 10 so that the child's life or health is, or is likely to be, endangered. If the charge is prosecuted as an indictable offence, the maximum penalty is five years in prison. Lower maximums apply on summary conviction.
Criminal Negligence Section 219(1) of the Code defines criminal negligence as doing something, or failing to do something that is a legal duty, in a way that shows wanton or reckless disregard for the lives or safety of others. If a child suffers bodily harm because of criminal negligence, s.221 carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison on indictment, or a lower maximum on summary conviction. If a child dies because of criminal negligence, s.220 carries a maximum penalty of life imprisonment. If a firearm was involved, there is also a mandatory minimum sentence of four years in prison.
Financial Abuse
Theft by Person Holding power of attorneyAuthority to act for another person in financial matters Section 331 makes it a crime for someone who has been given a power of attorney over property, meaning legal authority to manage or sell someone else's real estate or other belongings, to fraudulently sell, mortgage, pledge or otherwise deal with that property, or to pocket the proceeds for an unauthorized purpose. Section 331 makes it theft for a person entrusted with a power of attorney over property to fraudulently deal with that property for a purpose other than the one authorized. The value-based classification and penalties are set by s. 334. Theft over $5,000 can carry up to 10 years by indictment. Theft of $5,000 or less can carry up to two years by indictment or may proceed by summary conviction. If the value was $5,000 or less and the charge is treated as an indictable offence, the maximum penalty is two years in prison, with less harsh sentences for charges treated as summary convictions.
What is Needed to Convict
For any of these offences, the Crown must prove beyond a reasonable doubtThe standard that must be exceeded to find someone guilty that you committed each element of the charged offence. For example, in an assault charge, the Crown must prove that you intentionally applied force; in a neglect charge, it must prove that you failed a legal duty without lawful excuse. The judge or jury will assess the credibility of all witnesses, including any child who testifies, as part of deciding whether the Crown has proved the case. If there is a reasonable doubt about any essential element of the offence, you must be acquitted. Your lawyer may also be able to argue that your rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms were violated during the police investigation, which could affect whether certain evidenceInformation presented in court to prove or disprove facts. can be used against you.
Child Abuse and the Criminal Code
The Criminal Code does not use 'child abuse' as one single offence name. Abuse or neglect of a child may be charged under specific offences such as failure to provide necessaries of life, abandoning a child, assault, aggravated assault, sexual offences against young people, or other offences depending on the facts. Abuse of a person under 18 is also treated as an aggravating factor at sentencing.
The Criminal Code also contains a limited corrective-force provision in s. 43. Its scope is narrow and fact-specific. This page does not give advice about whether it could apply in any individual case.
Related offences may include criminal negligence, child pornography, child luring, abduction, uttering threats, or homicide offences, depending on the facts.
Possible Penalties
These are maximum sentences. Actual sentences depend on the facts, criminal history, and any mitigating or aggravating circumstances.
Failure to provide necessaries of life — s. 215
HybridApplies to parents, guardians and others under a legal duty (s. 215(1)) who fail without lawful excuse to provide necessaries of life. The section sets no summary-conviction maximum, so the general s. 787 default applies: a fine of up to $5,000, imprisonment for up to two years less a day, or both.
Abandoning a child under 10 — s. 218
HybridApplies where a child under the age of 10 is abandoned or exposed so that the child's life is or is likely to be endangered or their health is or is likely to be permanently injured; "abandon or expose" is defined in s. 214. The section sets no summary-conviction maximum, so the general s. 787 default applies: a fine of up to $5,000, imprisonment for up to two years less a day, or both.
Assault — s. 266
HybridThe base assault offence (assault is defined in s. 265). The section sets no summary-conviction maximum, so the general s. 787 default applies: a fine of up to $5,000, imprisonment for up to two years less a day, or both.
Assault with a weapon, causing bodily harm, or choking — s. 267
HybridCovers assault while carrying, using or threatening to use a weapon or imitation weapon, assault causing bodily harm, and choking, suffocating or strangling the complainant. The section sets no summary-conviction maximum, so the general s. 787 default applies: a fine of up to $5,000, imprisonment for up to two years less a day, or both.
Aggravated assault — s. 268
IndictableAssault that wounds, maims, disfigures or endangers the life of the complainant (s. 268(1)).
Sexual interference (victim under 16) — s. 151
HybridTouching a person under 16 for a sexual purpose. Mandatory minimums as written in the section: one year by indictment; 90 days on summary conviction. The section sets its own summary-conviction maximum of two years less a day, so the s. 787 default does not apply.
Invitation to sexual touching (victim under 16) — s. 152
HybridInviting, counselling or inciting a person under 16 to sexual touching. Mandatory minimums as written in the section: one year by indictment; 90 days on summary conviction. The section sets its own summary-conviction maximum of two years less a day, so the s. 787 default does not apply.
Sexual exploitation of a young person (16–17) — s. 153
HybridApplies where the accused is in a position of trust or authority towards a young person (defined in s. 153(2) as 16 or more but under 18), the young person is in a relationship of dependency with the accused, or the relationship is exploitative of the young person. Mandatory minimums as written in the section: one year by indictment; 90 days on summary conviction. The section sets its own summary-conviction maximum of two years less a day, so the s. 787 default does not apply.
Sexual assault (complainant under 16) — s. 271
HybridWhere the complainant is under 16, s. 271 sets a higher indictable maximum of 14 years. Mandatory minimums as written in the section: one year by indictment; six months on summary conviction. The section sets its own summary-conviction maximum of two years less a day for this scenario, so the s. 787 default does not apply. Some mandatory minimum sentences have been challenged under the Charter. This page summarizes the Criminal Code wording, but a lawyer can advise how the law may apply in a specific case.
Sexual assault (complainant 16 or 17) — s. 271
HybridWhere the complainant is 16 or older, the general s. 271 penalties apply: 10 years by indictment, and a section-specific summary-conviction maximum of two years less a day (the s. 787 default does not apply). No mandatory minimum in this scenario. A victim aged 16 or 17 is still a person under 18, so the s. 718.01 / s. 718.2(a)(ii.1) sentencing provisions remain engaged.
What these words mean
- Indictable
- The more serious way to prosecute an offence. It can carry higher maximum penalties.
- Summary conviction
- The less serious, usually faster way to prosecute an offence, with lower maximum penalties.
- Hybrid
- An offence the Crown can prosecute either way — by indictment or by summary conviction.
- Summary only
- Summary-only offences are prosecuted by summary conviction. The Criminal Code sets the maximum penalty in the specific offence section.
- Crown election
- The Crown prosecutor’s choice of which way to proceed on a hybrid offence.
Possible Defences and Legal Issues
This page covers more than one section. Possible defences and legal issues are set out by section below.
Assault Offences Against a Child — ss.266-268
This page covers several different Criminal Code offences involving children. There is no single defence that applies to all of them — the rows below set out how each family of offences is treated.
For assault-type charges (simple assault under section 266, assault with a weapon or causing bodily harm under section 267, and aggravated assault under section 268), assault is defined in section 265, and that definition “applies to all forms of assault”. Section 265(3) says that “no consent is obtained where the complainant submits or does not resist by reason of” the application of force, threats or fear of force, fraud, or the exercise of authority. Section 265(4) adds a related rule: if there is enough evidence that, if believed, “the evidence would constitute a defence” of honest belief in consent, the judge must instruct the jury to consider “the presence or absence of reasonable grounds for that belief”. Neither provision guarantees that a defence will succeed.
Section 268 also has a narrow exception limited to excision, infibulation, or mutilation of the labia majora, labia minora, or clitoris: consent to that specific conduct is not valid “except in the cases described in paragraphs (3)(a) and (b)” -- a qualifying surgical procedure performed for the person's physical health or normal reproductive or sexual function, or where the person is at least eighteen and there is no resulting bodily harm.
Beyond this, sections 266, 267, and 268 do not list further special defences. The Crown still has to prove the assault and the specific aggravating element for the section charged.
Failure to Provide the Necessaries of Life — s.215
Section 215 says the offence applies when a person under a legal duty “fails without lawful excuse to perform” that duty in the circumstances the section describes. If there is evidence capable of raising a lawful excuse, the Crown must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the person failed to perform the duty without lawful excuse. What counts as a lawful excuse depends on the facts and the law.
Section 215(4)(d) also says that receiving necessaries of life from someone who is not under a legal duty to provide them “is not a defence” to this charge.
Abandoning a Child — s.218
Section 218 does not list a special defence in the offence wording. The Crown still has to prove that the accused unlawfully abandoned or exposed a child under the age of ten, and that the child's life was, or was likely to be, endangered, or the child's health was, or was likely to be, permanently injured.
Possible issues may still depend on the facts, the evidence, and whether the Crown can prove each part of the offence. This is general legal information, not legal advice.
Child Sexual Offences — ss.151-153, 271
Sections 151 (sexual interference), 152 (invitation to sexual touching), and 153 (sexual exploitation) do not list a special defence in their own wording. The Crown still has to prove the sexual purpose or sexual nature of the conduct, the complainant's age where relevant to the charge, and the other parts of the offence.
Section 271 (sexual assault) also does not list a special defence in its own wording. However, assault is defined in section 265, which is attached to this page, and section 265(2) says that definition “applies to all forms of assault”, including sexual assault. Section 265(3) says that “no consent is obtained where the complainant submits or does not resist by reason of” the application of force, threats or fear of force, fraud, or the exercise of authority. Section 265(4) sets a related rule: where there is enough evidence that, if believed, “the evidence would constitute a defence” of honest belief in consent, the judge must instruct the jury to consider “the presence or absence of reasonable grounds for that belief”. Neither provision guarantees that a defence will succeed. Sections 150.1 and 273.1-273.2, which set out further consent and mistake-of-age rules specific to sexual offences involving young complainants, are not yet attached to this page and are not analyzed here (see advisorQuestions).
Possible issues may still depend on the facts, the evidence, and whether the Crown can prove each part of the offence. This is general legal information, not legal advice.
Common Legal Terms
Terms marked with a dotted underline in the article above are defined here and available in the full site glossary.
- Evidence Glossary entry →
Evidence is information presented in court to prove or disprove facts. It can include witness testimony, documents, photos, videos, physical objects, expert opinions, and other material the court allows.
- Hybrid offence Glossary entry →
A hybrid offence is an offence where the Crown can choose whether to proceed by summary conviction or by indictment. The choice can affect the procedure, possible penalties, and sometimes the court where the case is heard.
- Indictable offence Glossary entry →
An indictable offence is generally a more serious type of Canadian criminal offence. Some indictable matters have higher maximum penalties and may involve different court procedures, including election about the mode of trial in some cases.
- Power of attorney Glossary entry →
A legal document giving one person, or more than one person, the authority to manage your money and property on your behalf. In most of Canada the person you appoint is called an “attorney.” That person does not need to be a lawyer.
- Reasonable doubt Glossary entry →
The Supreme Court of Canada has said that reasonable doubt “falls much closer to absolute certainty than to proof on a balance of probabilities” and “that something less than absolute certainty is required, and that something more than probable guilt is required."
- Spanking Glossary entry →
- Spanking refers to physical discipline of a child. Canadian criminal law has a narrow defence for some corrective force, but the defence is limited and fact-specific. Force that is harmful, degrading, excessive, or outside the legal limits can still lead to criminal consequences.
- Summary conviction Glossary entry →
Summary convictions are used for lesser offences with penalties, fines and short jail time. They reflect the majority of offences as defined in the Code.
- Uttering threats Glossary entry →
- Uttering threats is a Criminal Code offence. It can involve knowingly saying, writing, sending, or otherwise conveying a threat to cause death or bodily harm, damage property, or kill, poison, or injure an animal. The Crown must prove the required elements of the offence.
Legal sources
The official statute section(s) this page is based on. Always confirm against the official source before relying on it.
-
Criminal Code s. 215 Main offence (failure to provide necessaries of life)Last reviewed by CCH: 2026-07-05View official source ↗
-
Criminal Code s. 218 Main offence (abandoning child)Source current to: 2026-07-23View official source ↗
-
Criminal Code s. 266 Main offence (assault)Source current to: 2026-07-23View official source ↗
-
Criminal Code s. 267 Main offence (assault with a weapon, bodily harm or choking)Source current to: 2026-07-23View official source ↗
-
Criminal Code s. 268 Main offence (aggravated assault)Source current to: 2026-07-23View official source ↗
-
Criminal Code s. 151 Main offence (sexual interference)Source current to: 2026-07-23View official source ↗
-
Criminal Code s. 152 Main offence (invitation to sexual touching)Source current to: 2026-07-23View official source ↗
-
Criminal Code s. 153 Main offence (sexual exploitation)Source current to: 2026-07-23View official source ↗
-
Criminal Code s. 271 Main offence (sexual assault)Source current to: 2026-07-23View official source ↗
-
Criminal Code s. 214 Definition (abandon or expose — applies to s. 218)Source current to: 2026-07-23View official source ↗
-
Criminal Code s. 265 Definition (assault — applies to ss. 266–268 and sexual assault)Source current to: 2026-07-23View official source ↗
-
Criminal Code s. 718.01 Sentencing factor (primary consideration: denunciation and deterrence for off...Source current to: 2026-07-23View official source ↗
-
Criminal Code s. 718.2 Sentencing factor (aggravating: abuse of a person under 18 — s. 718.2(a)(ii.1...Source current to: 2026-07-23View official source ↗
-
Criminal Code s. 787 General penalty (summary conviction default)Source current to: 2026-07-23View official source ↗
-
Criminal Code s. 150.1 Consent no defence (young persons); close-in-age and mistake-of-age limitsSource current to: 2026-07-23View official source ↗
-
Criminal Code s. 273.1 Meaning of consent (sexual offences)Source current to: 2026-07-23View official source ↗
-
Criminal Code s. 273.2 Belief-in-consent limits (sexual offences)Source current to: 2026-07-23View official source ↗
-
Criminal Code s. 43 Correction of child by force — narrow justificationSource current to: 2026-07-23View official source ↗
-
Criminal Code s. 264 Criminal harassmentSource current to: 2026-07-23View official source ↗
-
Criminal Code s. 264.1 Uttering threatsSource current to: 2026-07-23View official source ↗
-
Criminal Code s. 331 Theft by person holding power of attorneySource current to: 2026-07-23View official source ↗
Government References
- Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedomshttps://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/rfc-dlc/ccrf-ccdl/
- Criminal Codehttps://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/
- Criminal Harassment: Stalkinghttps://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/health-promotion/stop-family-violence/publications/criminal-harassment-stalking.html
Find a Criminal Defence Lawyer Near You
If you or someone you know is facing criminal charges, a criminal defence lawyer can review the situation and explain the options.
Search the Lawyer DirectoryCriminal Code Help does not endorse or recommend specific lawyers.
Report an inaccuracy or concern about this page
Report an inaccuracy or concern about this page
Report: Child Abuse
Use this form to report a possible error, outdated information, unclear wording, broken link, or other concern about this page.
General legal information only. Not legal advice. We do our best to keep this page accurate and up to date, but criminal law can change and every case depends on its facts. Check the review date and consult the Criminal Code or a criminal defence lawyer before relying on this information.
About this page
Criminal Code Help explains selected Criminal Code offences and related legal concepts in plain language. The goal is to help readers understand the general meaning of the law without having to read the full statutory text.
This page is a simplified summary. It does not include every exception, definition, court interpretation, evidentiary issue, Charter issue, sentencing factor, or procedural rule that may apply in a real case.
Legal information, not legal advice
This page is general legal information only. It is not legal advice and should not be relied on as advice about any specific charge, investigation, court file, or personal situation.
Possible defences and legal issues depend on the facts, the evidence, the exact charge, current Canadian law, and the province or territory where the case is being handled. If you are facing a criminal charge or researching a real legal problem, speak with a criminal defence lawyer in your province or territory.