Sexual Offences Criminal Code, s. 162 Hybrid

Voyeurism

Voyeurism is the offence of secretly observing or making a visual recording of a person who has a reasonable expectation of privacy.

Last reviewed: July 2026 Section: Criminal Code, s. 162 Classification: Hybrid
Jump to section

Plain-Language Summary

Voyeurism: The Meaning and the Penalties

Voyeurism means secretly watching or recording someone who has a right to privacy — for example while they are nude, in a place where privacy is expected, or for a sexual purpose. The Crown must prove you did this on purpose. The longest sentence is 10 years for a serious charge. A less serious charge carries a shorter maximum.

Voyeurism: can be described as deriving pleasure from watching or recording images of someone engaged in private activities without their consent. A voyeur typically gets sexually aroused watching people who are undressing, naked or engaging in sexual activities. According to the Department of Justice (DoJ), voyeurism can be defined as a behaviour and as a sexual disorder. Under section 162 (1) of the Criminal CodeA federal act codifying most criminal offences in Canada, those guilty of voyeurism may face a maximum jail sentence of ten years. A conviction will result in a criminal record and possible inclusion on the National Sex Offender Registry.

What is Voyeurism?

A voyeur can be described as a Peeping Tom, or someone who surreptitiously watches through an unsuspecting person's window as they undress. The DoJ states that a voyeur is generally "a person who derives sexual gratification from the covert observation of others as they undress or engage in sexual activities," as defined by the Canadian Oxford Dictionary. Most voyeurs "engage in at least one other sexually deviant behaviour, usually exhibitionism or non-consensual sexual touching or rubbing," the justice department notes. According to the Criminal Code, it is an offence to surreptitiously observe - including by mechanical or electronic means - or make a visual recording of a person who is in circumstances that give rise to a reasonable expectation of privacy, if: the person is in a place in which they can reasonably expect to be nude, to expose their genital organs or anal region or her breasts, or to be engaged in explicit sexual activity; the person is nude, is exposing their genital organs or anal region or her breasts, or is engaged in explicit sexual activity, and the observation or recording is done for the purpose of observing or recording a person in such a state or engaged in such an activity; or the observation or recording is done for a sexual purpose. Examples of voyeurism include using a hidden camera to record someone in a hotel shower or public change room or recording images of someone in their bedroom without their knowledge. A person would expect a right to privacy not only in their home but in such places as changing rooms, public bathrooms or the washroom at work. The Supreme Court of Canada has explained that privacy is not an all-or-nothing concept, and that a reasonable expectation of privacy can exist even in a public or semi-public space. Whether an observation or recording invades privacy depends on a range of factors — including where the person was, the form the observation or recording took, its nature, what the person was doing, and the part of the body that was the focus of the recording.

What the Crown must Prove

To win a conviction for voyeurism, the Crown must prove that you watched or recorded someone surreptitiously in circumstances where there was a reasonable expectation of privacy.

Whether the Crown also has to prove a purpose depends on the part of s.162(1) being used.

Under s.162(1)(a), the charge depends on where the observation or recording happened. It applies to a place where people can reasonably be expected to be nude or engaged in explicit sexual activity, such as a bathroom or change room. No purpose has to be proven under this part.

Under s.162(1)(b), the charge depends on the person actually being nude or engaged in explicit sexual activity. The Crown must also prove that the observation or recording was made in order to capture someone in that state. That is a purpose element, but it is not a sexual-purpose requirement.

Under s.162(1)(c), the observation or recording must be done for a sexual purpose. In that situation, the Crown must prove that purpose.

ConsentVoluntary agreement to engage in an sexual act is not an element the Crown must prove under s.162(1). The offence turns on the private circumstances of the observation or recording.

Charter issues may also matter if police searched a phone, computer, or other device in a way that violated your rights.

Treated as a Summary Conviction or Indictable Offence

Voyeurism is considered a hybrid offenceAn offence the Crown can proceed with summarily or by indictment., meaning it can be prosecuted as an indictable offenceA more serious type of Canadian criminal offence. or a summary convictionUsed for lesser offences. You will receive a harsher sentence if you are convicted of an indictable offence.

Penalties for Voyeurism

If you are convicted of an indictable offence, the court could impose a maximum sentence of ten years in prison. If convicted by summary conviction, the maximum penalty is two years less a day in prison and/or a $5,000 fine. You may also be placed on the National Sex Offender Registry, which is administered by the RCMP and accessible to police across the country.

Possible Penalties

These are maximum sentences. Actual sentences depend on the facts, criminal history, and any mitigating or aggravating circumstances.

Voyeurism (surreptitious observation or recording) — s. 162(1)

Hybrid
Maximum penalty (by indictment)
10 years
How it proceeds
Crown may proceed by indictment or summary conviction

No section-specific summary maximum is stated; the general s. 787 default applies — a fine of up to $5,000 and/or imprisonment of up to two years less a day. No mandatory minimum.

Distributing, publishing, selling, advertising, making available, or possessing for those purposes a voyeuristic recording — s. 162(4)

Hybrid
Maximum penalty (by indictment)
10 years
How it proceeds
Crown may proceed by indictment or summary conviction

No section-specific summary maximum is stated; the general s. 787 default applies — a fine of up to $5,000 and/or imprisonment of up to two years less a day. No mandatory minimum.

What these words mean
Indictable
The more serious way to prosecute an offence. It can carry higher maximum penalties.
Summary conviction
The less serious, usually faster way to prosecute an offence, with lower maximum penalties.
Hybrid
An offence the Crown can prosecute either way — by indictment or by summary conviction.
Summary only
Summary-only offences are prosecuted by summary conviction. The Criminal Code sets the maximum penalty in the specific offence section.
Crown election
The Crown prosecutor’s choice of which way to proceed on a hybrid offence.

Possible Defences and Legal Issues

Voyeurism — s.162

Voyeurism has a narrow public-good defence. No person can be convicted under this section "if the acts that are alleged to constitute the offence serve the public good and do not extend beyond what serves the public good". This is not a broad excuse — it is a question of law whether the acts served the public good and whether there is evidence they went beyond that, and a question of fact whether they actually did. The accused's motives are not relevant to this defence.

Other possible issues may depend on the facts, including whether the Crown can prove the observation or recording, the place or circumstances required by the specific part of s.162(1) charged, the sexual-purpose element where that part applies, and the accused person's identity. This is general legal information, not legal advice.

Common Legal Terms

Terms marked with a dotted underline in the article above are defined here and available in the full site glossary.

The voluntary agreement of the complainant to engage in the sexual activity in question.

Hybrid offence
Glossary entry →

A hybrid offence is an offence where the Crown can choose whether to proceed by summary conviction or by indictment. The choice can affect the procedure, possible penalties, and sometimes the court where the case is heard.

Indictable offence
Glossary entry →

An indictable offence is generally a more serious type of Canadian criminal offence. Some indictable matters have higher maximum penalties and may involve different court procedures, including election about the mode of trial in some cases.

Summary conviction
Glossary entry →

Summary convictions are used for lesser offences with penalties, fines and short jail time. They reflect the majority of offences as defined in the Code.

Legal sources

The official statute section(s) this page is based on. Always confirm against the official source before relying on it.

Government References

Find a Criminal Defence Lawyer Near You

If you or someone you know is facing criminal charges, a criminal defence lawyer can review the situation and explain the options.

Search the Lawyer Directory

Criminal Code Help does not endorse or recommend specific lawyers.

Report an inaccuracy or concern about this page

Report an inaccuracy or concern about this page

Report: Voyeurism

Use this form to report a possible error, outdated information, unclear wording, broken link, or other concern about this page.

This form is for page concerns only. Do not send confidential case details or legal questions.

Fields marked with * are required.

What are you reporting?
Please include the sentence, section, or issue you are concerned about.
Optional. You may include a link to legislation, a court decision, or another reliable source.
Optional.
Optional. Include your email only if you are willing to be contacted about this report.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.