Motor Vehicle Offences Criminal Code, s. 236, 220, 320.13, 320.14, 320.16

Vehicular Manslaughter

Several sections can be used to prosecute vehicular manslaughter, including; dangerous driving, criminal negligence, hit and run and impaired driving.

Last reviewed: July 2026 Section: Criminal Code, s. 236, 220, 320.13, 320.14, 320.16 Procedure: Not a distinct offence — the charge depends on the facts. See the related offences.
Jump to section

Plain-Language Summary

Vehicular Manslaughter: Which Charges Can Apply in Canada

Vehicular manslaughter is not one single charge. It covers crimes where driving causes a death. That includes dangerous or impaired driving. It also covers criminal negligence, and failing to stop. Each of these can carry a life sentence. Some carry a minimum penalty even for a first offence.

Vehicular Manslaughter: While most U.S. states have laws for vehicular homicideIntentionally causing death or vehicular manslaughterCausing death as a result of a driving incident, there is no single charge in the Criminal CodeA federal act codifying most criminal offences in Canada dealing with a death as a result of a driving incident. Instead, the offenceA criminal activity is covered in driving provisions of the Code including dangerous driving causing death, criminal negligence causing death, hit and run and impaired driving. Depending on which charge is used to prosecute, you could be jailed for life. To be convicted you would have to commit a traffic violation that led to the death. While offences covering vehicular deaths are established federally, enforcement, apprehension, prosecution and application of penalties fall within provincial and territorial authority and penalties may vary depending on the jurisdiction.

What is Vehicular Manslaughter?

There are about eight million registered passenger vehicles in Canada. In 2019, 1,762 people were killed in traffic accidents, according to Transport Canada (Canadian Motor Vehicle Traffic Collision Statistics: 2019). MADD Canada reports (The Rate of Impaired Driving in Canada) that collisions involving alcohol and/or drugs are a leading criminal cause of death in this country with up to four Canadians dying each day.

Canada does not usually use "vehicular manslaughter" as a separate Criminal Code charge. A death caused by driving may be prosecuted under different Criminal Code sections, depending on what the Crown says happened.

If a person intentionally uses a vehicle to kill someone, the charge may be murder. If the Crown does not allege an intent to kill, other death-causing driving offences may apply. The exact charge depends on the driving, the evidence, and the connection between the driving and the death.

The Code contains several provisions that can apply to driving offences causing death, including:

  • criminal negligence causing death, s.220;
  • dangerous operation causing death, s.320.13(3);
  • impaired driving causing death, s.320.14(3); and
  • failure to stop causing death, s.320.16(3).

Charges Used to Prosecute Vehicular Homicide

The Criminal Code includes several sections that can be used when driving causes death. Provinces and territories may also impose traffic penalties, including licence suspensions.

Criminal Negligence Causing Death

A person can be convicted of criminal negligence causing death under s.220 if their conduct showed wanton or reckless disregard for the lives or safety of other people and caused a death. Bad driving alone is not always criminal negligence. The conduct must meet the Criminal Code test. Criminal negligence causing death is an indictable offence with a maximum sentence of life in prison.

Dangerous Operation Causing Death

Section 320.13(3) creates the offence of dangerous operation causing death. The punishment is set by s. 320.21: the offence is indictable and carries a maximum of life imprisonment, together with the applicable first-, second-, or subsequent-offence minimum set out in that section.

Impaired Driving Causing Death

Section 320.14(3) creates the offence of impaired operation causing death. The punishment is set by s. 320.21: the offence is indictable and carries a maximum of life imprisonment, together with the applicable first-, second-, or subsequent-offence minimum set out in that section.

Failure to Stop Causing Death

Drivers are legally required to remain at the scene of an accident. Under s. 320.16(3), a person commits failure to stop causing death if they commit the failure-to-stop offence and, at the time, know or are reckless as to whether the accident resulted in another person’s death or in bodily harm from which that person later dies. The punishment is set by s. 320.21: the offence is indictable and carries a maximum of life imprisonment, together with the applicable first-, second-, or subsequent-offence minimum set out in that section.

Street Racing Causing Death

A death caused while street racing is usually prosecuted as dangerous operation causing death under s.320.13(3) or impaired driving causing death under s.320.14(3), depending on the facts. Both carry a maximum of life imprisonment.

What is Needed to Convict

What the Crown must prove depends on which charge you are facing, because this area of the law covers several distinct offences.

For criminal negligence causing death (s.220), the Crown must prove that your conduct showed a wanton or reckless disregard for the lives or safety of other people, and that this caused the death. Courts describe this as a marked and substantial departure from how a reasonable person would act.

For dangerous operation causing death (s.320.13(3)), the Crown must prove that the way you operated the vehicle was objectively dangerous, meaning a marked departure from what a reasonable person would have done in the same circumstances. Importantly, the Crown does not have to prove that you personally recognised the risk and ignored it. The test looks at how any reasonable person would have assessed the situation, not only what was in your mind at the time.

For impaired operation causing death (s.320.14(3)), the Crown must prove that you were operating the vehicle while your ability was impaired by alcohol or a drug (or while your blood alcohol or drug concentration exceeded the legal limit), and that your driving caused the death.

For failure to stop causing death (s.320.16(3)), the Crown must prove that you were involved in an accident, that you knew or were reckless about whether the accident involved another person or vehicle, that you failed without a reasonable excuse to stop, give your name and address, and offer assistance, and that you knew or were reckless about whether the accident had caused someone's death or fatal injuries.

In every case the Crown must prove its case beyond a reasonable doubtThe standard that must be exceeded to find someone guilty.

Depending on the charge, you may be able to argue that external factors such as weather conditions or a sudden mechanical failure contributed to what happened. Your lawyer may also be able to show that your rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms were breached during the police investigation.

Treated as an Indictable Offence

If you are charged with a driving offence that caused a death, the charge is an indictable offenceA more serious type of Canadian criminal offence.. There is no lesser summary-conviction version for any of the death-causing offences described on this page. Your case will be heard in a higher court (Superior Court or equivalent), and you have the right to elect trial by judge alone or by judge and jury.

What 'vehicular manslaughter' means

Vehicular manslaughter is not a distinct Criminal Code offence name. In Canada, a death involving a vehicle may be charged under offences such as manslaughter, criminal negligence causing death, dangerous operation causing death, impaired operation causing death, or failure to stop after an accident causing death, depending on the facts.

Possible Defences and Legal Issues

This page covers more than one section. Possible defences and legal issues are set out by section below.

Vehicular Manslaughter — ss.220, 236 & 320.13(3)

Depending on the facts, a death caused by driving may be prosecuted as manslaughter (s.236), criminal negligence causing death (s.220), or dangerous operation causing death (s.320.13(3)). None of these three provisions lists a special defence in the Criminal Code. The Crown still has to prove the parts of whichever offence is charged — for example, that the conduct showed wanton or reckless disregard for the lives or safety of others (criminal negligence), or that the driving was a marked departure from what a reasonable driver would do (dangerous operation) — and in every case that this caused the death.

Possible issues may still depend on the facts, the evidence, and whether the Crown can prove each part of the offence actually charged. This is general legal information, not legal advice.

Vehicular Manslaughter — ss.320.14(3) & 320.16(3)

Two of the driving offences that can lead to a vehicular-manslaughter-type charge build a narrow exception or an excuse-based element into the underlying offence. Impaired operation causing death (s.320.14(3)) and failure to stop causing death (s.320.16(3)) each only apply once the person “commits an offence under subsection (1)” of that section — the basic, non-death offence. That means the after-driving alcohol or drug-consumption exceptions in s.320.14(5) to (7), and the requirement that a failure to stop under s.320.16(1) be “without reasonable excuse”, can still matter. These are explained in more detail on the Impaired Driving and Hit and Run pages.

These exceptions are narrow. The Crown still has to prove the parts of the offence actually charged, including that the driving caused the death.

Common Legal Terms

Terms marked with a dotted underline in the article above are defined here and available in the full site glossary.

Indictable offence
Glossary entry →

An indictable offence is generally a more serious type of Canadian criminal offence. Some indictable matters have higher maximum penalties and may involve different court procedures, including election about the mode of trial in some cases.

Reasonable doubt
Glossary entry →

The Supreme Court of Canada has said that reasonable doubt “falls much closer to absolute certainty than to proof on a balance of probabilities” and “that something less than absolute certainty is required, and that something more than probable guilt is required."

Legal sources

The official statute section(s) this page is based on. Always confirm against the official source before relying on it.

Government References

Find a Criminal Defence Lawyer Near You

If you or someone you know is facing criminal charges, a criminal defence lawyer can review the situation and explain the options.

Search the Lawyer Directory

Criminal Code Help does not endorse or recommend specific lawyers.

Report an inaccuracy or concern about this page

Report an inaccuracy or concern about this page

Report: Vehicular Manslaughter

Use this form to report a possible error, outdated information, unclear wording, broken link, or other concern about this page.

This form is for page concerns only. Do not send confidential case details or legal questions.

Fields marked with * are required.

What are you reporting?
Please include the sentence, section, or issue you are concerned about.
Optional. You may include a link to legislation, a court decision, or another reliable source.
Optional.
Optional. Include your email only if you are willing to be contacted about this report.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.