Administration of Justice Criminal Code, s. 127 Hybrid

Disobeying an Order of the Court

Disobeying a court order could have you additionally sentenced on top of any penalty for the charge that brought you to court in the first place.

Last reviewed: June 2026 Section: Criminal Code, s. 127 Classification: Hybrid
Jump to section

Plain-Language Summary

Disobeying an Order of the Court: What the Charge Means

Disobeying a court order means not doing what a court has legally told you to do — or doing something it told you not to do — without a lawful excuse. The Crown must show you knew about the order. The maximum penalty is up to 2 years in prison.

What disobeying a court order is

A court order is a lawful direction made by a court, or by someone legally authorized to make the order, telling a person what they must do or must not do.

Disobeying an order of the court means failing to follow a lawful court order when you had no lawful excuse for not following it.

This offence can apply when someone disobeys a lawful court order, but not every breach of an order is handled under this section. Some orders have their own Criminal Code offence or procedure.

For example, this may involve a person disobeying a non-money court order, unless another law provides a specific procedure or penalty.

Legal source: Criminal Code section 127. The section uses the words "without lawful excuse." It applies unless another punishment or way of proceeding is expressly provided by law. Orders for payment of money are not covered by this section.

What the prosecutor has to prove

"The Crown" is the prosecutor — the government lawyer who brings the charge. To convict you of this offence, the prosecutor must prove, beyond a reasonable doubtThe standard that must be exceeded to find someone guilty, that:

  1. there was a lawful court order; and
  2. you disobeyed it without a lawful excuse.

Whether something counts as a lawful excuse is decided on the facts of the case.

Legal source: Criminal Code section 127.

How this offence is prosecuted

Canada deals with criminal charges in two main ways:

  • Summary convictionUsed for lesser offences — the process used for less serious cases, with lower maximum penalties.
  • Indictable — the process used for more serious cases, with higher maximum penalties.

This offence is hybrid, which means the prosecutor chooses which of those two ways to proceed, based on the case. The maximum penalty is higher if the prosecutor proceeds by indictment.

Possible penalties

If the prosecutor proceeds by indictment, the maximum is 2 years in prison. The offence can also be dealt with by summary conviction, which carries lower maximum penalties.

Legal source: Criminal Code section 127.

Related charges

Not every failure to follow a court order is dealt with under this section. Some situations — such as missing a court date, breaching bail or release conditions, or failing to follow probation conditions — fall under different Criminal Code offences with their own rules and penalties.

Those offences should be checked on their own pages.

What the Crown Must Prove

To get a conviction, the Crown must prove every part of the offence beyond a reasonable doubt.

Section 127

1

A lawful court order existed

A lawful order existed — made by a court of justice, or by a person or body of persons authorized by any Act to make or give the order.

2

You disobeyed it without a lawful excuse

You disobeyed the order without a lawful excuse. Whether something counts as a lawful excuse is decided on the facts of the case.

A proof rule (a presumption) is a rule about evidence. It does not mean the person is automatically guilty. It means the court may treat one fact as evidence of another fact unless there is evidence pointing the other way.

Possible Penalties

These are maximum sentences. Actual sentences depend on the facts, criminal history, and any mitigating or aggravating circumstances.

Disobeying an order of the court

Hybrid
Maximum (by indictment)
2 years
How it proceeds
Crown may proceed by indictment or summary conviction; lower maximums apply on summary conviction

Section 127 applies unless another punishment or procedure is expressly provided by law. Orders for payment of money are excluded. Offence: s. 127(1). Punishment: s. 127(1)(a) (indictable); s. 787(1) (summary conviction).

What these words mean
Indictable
The more serious way to prosecute an offence. It can carry higher maximum penalties.
Summary conviction
The less serious, usually faster way to prosecute an offence, with lower maximum penalties.
Hybrid
An offence the Crown can prosecute either way — by indictment or by summary conviction.
Summary only
Summary-only offences are prosecuted by summary conviction. The Criminal Code sets the maximum penalty in the specific offence section.
Crown election
The Crown prosecutor’s choice of which way to proceed on a hybrid offence.

Possible Defences and Legal Issues

Disobeying an Order of the Court — s.127

Section 127 says the offence applies when a person disobeys a lawful court order "without lawful excuse". If there is evidence capable of raising a lawful excuse, the Crown must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the person disobeyed the order without lawful excuse. What counts as a lawful excuse depends on the facts and the law.

Application / Scope

Disobeying an Order of the Court — Scope of s.127

Section 127 does not apply to every court order. It does not apply to an order "for the payment of money", and it does not apply if "a punishment or other mode of proceeding is expressly provided by law" for disobeying that particular order — for example, some orders are enforced under their own specific Criminal Code offence or procedure instead. Whether this section applies to a particular order depends on the order and the law that governs it.

Common Legal Terms

Terms marked with a dotted underline in the article above are defined here and available in the full site glossary.

Reasonable doubt
Glossary entry →

The Supreme Court of Canada has said that reasonable doubt “falls much closer to absolute certainty than to proof on a balance of probabilities” and “that something less than absolute certainty is required, and that something more than probable guilt is required."

Summary conviction
Glossary entry →

Summary convictions are used for lesser offences with penalties, fines and short jail time. They reflect the majority of offences as defined in the Code.

Legal sources

The official statute section(s) this page is based on. Always confirm against the official source before relying on it.

Government References

Find a Criminal Defence Lawyer Near You

If you or someone you know is facing criminal charges, a criminal defence lawyer can review the situation and explain the options.

Search the Lawyer Directory

Criminal Code Help does not endorse or recommend specific lawyers.

Report an inaccuracy or concern about this page

Report an inaccuracy or concern about this page

Report: Disobeying an Order of the Court

Use this form to report a possible error, outdated information, unclear wording, broken link, or other concern about this page.

This form is for page concerns only. Do not send confidential case details or legal questions.

Fields marked with * are required.

What are you reporting?
Please include the sentence, section, or issue you are concerned about.
Optional. You may include a link to legislation, a court decision, or another reliable source.
Optional.
Optional. Include your email only if you are willing to be contacted about this report.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.